BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Fairfield Connecticut structural steel construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut custom home expert witness Fairfield Connecticut hospital construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut tract home expert witness Fairfield Connecticut townhome construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut industrial building expert witness Fairfield Connecticut custom homes expert witness Fairfield Connecticut housing expert witness Fairfield Connecticut condominiums expert witness Fairfield Connecticut mid-rise construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut low-income housing expert witness Fairfield Connecticut Medical building expert witness Fairfield Connecticut casino resort expert witness Fairfield Connecticut retail construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut office building expert witness Fairfield Connecticut production housing expert witness Fairfield Connecticut parking structure expert witness Fairfield Connecticut high-rise construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut multi family housing expert witness Fairfield Connecticut landscaping construction expert witness Fairfield Connecticut Subterranean parking expert witness Fairfield Connecticut
    Fairfield Connecticut civil engineering expert witnessFairfield Connecticut structural engineering expert witnessesFairfield Connecticut civil engineer expert witnessFairfield Connecticut building code expert witnessFairfield Connecticut engineering consultantFairfield Connecticut multi family design expert witnessFairfield Connecticut reconstruction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    Connecticut Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fairfield Connecticut

    License required for electrical and plumbing trades. No state license for general contracting, however, must register with the State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & Remo Assn of Fairfield Co
    Local # 0780
    433 Meadow St
    Fairfield, CT 06824

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Eastern Connecticut
    Local # 0740
    20 Hartford Rd Suite 18
    Salem, CT 06420

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Haven Co
    Local # 0720
    2189 Silas Deane Highway
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hartford Cty Inc
    Local # 0755
    2189 Silas Deane Hwy
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of NW Connecticut
    Local # 0710
    110 Brook St
    Torrington, CT 06790

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Connecticut (State)
    Local # 0700
    3 Regency Dr Ste 204
    Bloomfield, CT 06002

    Fairfield Connecticut Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fairfield Connecticut


    New York Federal Court Enforces Construction Exclusion, Rejects Reimbursement Claim

    Water Damage Sub-Limit Includes Tear-Out Costs

    Message from the Chair: Kelsey Funes (Volume I)

    Developer’s Failure to Plead Amount of Damages in Cross-Complaint Fatal to Direct Action Against Subcontractor’s Insurers Based on Default Judgment

    Texas Court Construes Breach of Contract Exclusion Narrowly in Duty-to-Defend Case

    Ten Firm Members Recognized as Super Lawyers or Rising Stars

    Supreme Court Set to Alter Law on Key Project, Workforce Issues

    Vietnam Expands Arrests in Coffee Region Property Probe

    Parking Reform Takes Off on the West Coast

    Loaded Boom of Burning Tower Crane Collapses in Manhattan, Injuring Six

    Washington Supreme Court Finds Agent’s Representations in Certificate of Insurance Bind Insurance Company to Additional Insured Coverage

    The Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    Mortgage Whistleblower Stands Alone as U.S. Won’t Join Lawsuit

    Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Annual Forum Meeting in New Orleans

    Defending Against the Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine – Liability Considerations

    Policy Lanuage Expressly Prohibits Replacement of Undamaged Material to Match Damaged Material

    Court Says No to Additional Lawyer in Las Vegas Fraud Case

    Alleging and Proving a Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) Claim

    Default Should Never Be An Option

    Boston Construction Bands With Health Care to Fight COVID-19

    U.S. Supreme Court Halts Enforcement of the OSHA Vaccine or Test Mandate

    Homebuilding Design Goes 3D

    COVID-19 Likely No Longer Covered Under Force Majeure

    Settlement Reached on Troubled Harbor Bridge in Corpus Christi, Texas

    How to Fix America

    Nevada Supreme Court Rejects Class Action Status, Reducing Homes from 1000 to 71

    U.S. Building Permits Soared to Their Highest Level in Nearly Eight Years

    Napa Quake, Flooding Cost $4 Billion in U.S. in August

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Named to Hudson Valley Magazine’s 2022 Top Lawyers List

    Obtaining Temporary Injunction to Enforce Non-Compete Agreement

    The Treasures Inside Notre Dame Cathedral

    Technology and the Environment Lead Construction Trends That Will Continue Through 2019

    Tenth Circuit Finds Insurer Must Defend Unintentional Faulty Workmanship

    Harmon Tower Case Settled Prior to Start of Trial

    Sarah P. Long Expands Insurance Coverage Team at Payne & Fears

    Insurer Beware: Failure to Defend Ends with Hefty Verdict

    Standard of Care

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Sudden Death”

    Liability Coverage for Claims of Publishing Secret Data Does Not Require Access by Others

    New York City Council’s Carbon Emissions Regulation Opposed by Real Estate Board

    Hunton Insurance Coverage Partner Lawrence J. Bracken II Awarded Emory Public Interest Committee’s 2024 Lifetime Commitment to Public Service Award

    The OFCCP’s November 2019 Updated Technical Assistance Guide: What Every Federal Construction Contractor Should Know

    Inside the Old Psych Hospital Reborn As a Home for Money Managers

    Nine Haight Attorneys Selected for Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch 2021

    Conflict of Interest Accusations may Spark Lawsuit Against City and City Manager

    MTA Debarment Update

    Supreme Court of Washington State Upholds SFAA Position on Spearin Doctrine

    A General Contractor’s Guide to Additional Insured Coverage

    Comparative Breach of Contract – The New Benefit of the Bargain in Construction?

    Judicial Panel Denies Nationwide Consolidation of COVID-19 Business Interruption Cases
    Corporate Profile

    FAIRFIELD CONNECTICUT CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Fairfield, Connecticut Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/10/24) – New Type of Nuclear Reactor, Big Money Surrounding Sports Stadiums, and Positivity from Fannie Mae’s Monthly Consumer Survey

    February 05, 2024 —
    In our latest roundup, the commercial real estate market poses a risk to financial stability, New York City moves towards net-zero building emissions, workers at several Los Angeles area hotels tentatively agree to a new contract, and more! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Washington Supreme Court Interprets Ensuing Loss Exception in All-Risk Property Insurance Policy

    May 20, 2024 —
    The "ensuing loss" clause is a provision that restores coverage for property insurance claims that are subject to certain policy exclusions, such as “faulty workmanship” and “faulty design.” It applies in cases where there is damage from a covered cause of loss that ensues, or results from, the excluded cause of loss. Courts across jurisdictions have grappled with interpreting the breadth of this clause, leading to varying conclusions regarding its scope and applicability. One of the primary challenges in interpreting “ensuing loss” lies in determining the ultimate cause of damage. Courts must ascertain whether the ensuing loss is sufficiently distinct from the excluded event to warrant coverage under the policy. This analysis often hinges on whether the cause of loss is thought to constitute a separate and independent occurrence or is merely a continuation or exacerbation of the excluded event. Reprinted courtesy of David G. Jordan, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and William E. Phillips IV, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Mr. Jordan may be contacted at DJordan@sdvlaw.com Mr. Phillips may be contacted at WPhillips@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2023

    January 29, 2024 —
    Federal and state courts tackled many interesting insurance-related issues this past year. Perhaps no state had a more impactful year than Illinois, which held that construction defects could constitute an occurrence, that a LEG 3 “extension” attempting to preclude coverage for faulty or defective workmanship was ambiguous as a matter of law (applying Illinois law), and that ostensibly prohibitive “catch-all exclusions” can render policy language ambiguous in favor of coverage. Other courts wrestled with procedural inquiries, such as the legal duty of a broker in providing notice to an insurer or the ability of an insured to recoup its attorneys’ fees in pursuing a coverage action against its insurer. These are merely a sampling of the impactful insurance decisions rendered in 2023. Each year, we endeavor to identify cases of general interest to our clients and the broader insurance community. Specifically, we attempt to identify trends, cases of first impression, cases illustrating conflicts among the courts, or cases dealing with emerging issues. We now proudly unveil the top 10 most influential coverage decisions of 2023 and look ahead to a few cases to watch as 2024 unfolds. Reprinted courtesy of Jeffrey J. Vita, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Michael A. Amato, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Mr. Vita may be contacted at JVita@sdvlaw.com Mr. Amato may be contacted at MAmato@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    Residential Contractors, Be Sure to Have these Clauses in Your Contracts

    December 23, 2023 —
    I have often “mused” on the need to have a good solid construction contract at the beginning of a project. While this is always true, it is particularly true in residential contracting where a homeowner may or may not know the construction process or have experience with large scale construction. Often you, as a construction general contractor, are providing the first large scale construction that the homeowner has experienced. For this reason, through meetings and the construction contract, setting expectations early and often is key. As a side note to this need to set expectations, the Virginia Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation (DPOR) and the Virginia General Assembly require certain clauses to be in every residential construction contract. DPOR strictly enforces these contractual items and failure to put them in your contracts can lead to fines, penalties and possibly even revocation of a contractor’s license. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    What ‘The Curse’ Gets Wrong About Passive House Architecture

    April 02, 2024 —
    In the fifth episode of Showtime’s The Curse, two potential buyers are touring a boutique house in Española, a soon-to-be gentrified Santa Fe neighborhood when one of them makes a remark about the temperature. “Sorry, can I get a water? It’s just really hot in here,” he says, airing out his sweat-stained shirt. The quirky home’s architect-slash-developer, played by Emma Stone, says, “Sure!” and without skipping a beat, continues to explain the virtues of her passive house design: The home functions like a thermos, with no need for air conditioning — unless any air escapes the house. Then it takes five to seven hours for the room to recover. Owning a passive house sounds like a nightmare, right? If you’re buying a one-of-a-kind, mirror-clad spec house from Stone and co-star Nathan Fielder, it may well be. On The Curse, the two play a do-gooder couple attempting to make an HGTV series (with Benny Safdie) about turning regular houses into carbon-neutral passive homes. Odd things happen to Stone and Fielder over the show’s first season: trouble with the laws of gravity, the trials of a failing marriage and a literal curse from a small child. But the weirdest might be the show’s portrayal of passive house design, an energy-efficient design standard that has been around since the 1970s. Passive building, which has its origins in Europe, relies on advanced construction methods to seal a structure in an airtight envelope, thereby reducing energy consumption for heating and cooling by as much as 75%. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Teresa Xie, Bloomberg

    Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Annual Forum Meeting in New Orleans

    May 20, 2024 —
    Over 600 construction lawyers, experts, and consultants met in New Orleans last week for the Forum’s 2024 Annual Meeting where Program Coordinators Brenda Radmacher and Joseph Imperiale together with John Cook and Buck Beltzer put together an insightful program focused on all things construction litigation. Here are our 10 top take-aways from this unique program. 10. Don't underestimate the soft skills that are necessary to effectively represent your clients. There are different ways to measure success when it comes to construction litigation, according to Stephen Dale (WSP USA), Melissa Beutler Withy (Big-D), and Matthew Whipple (Wohlsen Construction). What these (and likely other inside counsel) will look for when retaining outside counsel is the ability to accurately forecast litigation expense and timely communicate case developments. Being able to master these "soft" skills is as important (if not more so) as an attorney's aptitude for trial advocacy. The in-house counsel who hire litigation counsel will be held accountable to deliver results on the investment they are making in legal fees. Outside counsel who cannot manage budgets or avoid surprises in the course of a case will not be successful as litigators. Reprinted courtesy of Marissa L. Downs, Laurie & Brennan, LLP and Brendan Witry, Laurie & Brennan, LLP Ms. Downs may be contacted at mdowns@lauriebrennan.com Mr. Witry may be contacted at bwitry@lauriebrennan.com Read the full story...

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “This Is Sufficient for Your Purposes …”

    April 08, 2024 —
    … but just barely. Federal courts are “notice” pleading courts. One source writes: “Notice pleading refers to pleading standards that merely notify the opposing party and court of the general issues in the case. In contrast to fact pleading standards, notice pleading standards do not require pleadings to include hyper-detailed facts in support of each claim.” Some state courts – including Louisiana – are fact pleading courts. Ordinarily, no one practicing in Louisiana state courts would describe the fact pleading requirements for initiating a lawsuit as mandating “hyper-detailing” of the facts, but … why risk it? In a construction mechanics lien case – the jurisprudence for which requires that courts strictly construe the related law because liens empower lien holders with rights which are “in derogation” of common property ownership rights – the defendant was successful in having the trial court dismiss a lien suit for failing to affirmatively set forth in the complaint (a “petition” in Louisiana) the date of substantial completion. The lien claimant appealed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Daniel Lund III, Phelps
    Mr. Lund may be contacted at daniel.lund@phelps.com

    Congratulations to San Diego Partner Alex Giannetto and Senior Associate Michael Ibach on Settling a Case 3 Weeks Into a 5-Week Trial!

    April 15, 2024 —
    Partner Alex Giannetto and Senior Associate Michael Ibach of BWB&O’s San Diego office started a trial in San Diego set to last at least five weeks. Plaintiffs alleged causes of action of negligence, trespass and nuisance against BWB&O’s client, arguing the owner/property manager did not properly handle alleged overwatering of the front yard, allegedly resulting in a landslide impacting 8 homes on a City slope in Carlsbad. Cross-Complainant City alleged independent negligence to fix the slope it owned and controlled as well as various indemnity-based causes of action against BWB&O’s client. Plaintiffs claimed over $24 million in damages, while Cross-Complainant placed sole blame for the incident on BWB&O’s client around $6 million. Heading into trial, it was made clear that neither Plaintiffs nor Cross-Complainant would accept anything less than 7-figures to settle BWB&O’s client out of the case. In the first week of trial, BWB&O was able to leverage motions in limine, opening statements, and cross-examinations to secure a dismissal of three of the four causes of action alleged by Plaintiff that were associated with pain & suffering. In the second week of trial, BWB&O secured a dismissal of Cross-Complainant’s negligence cause of action paving the way for a settlement with Plaintiffs. Leveraging the threat of a non-suit when Plaintiffs rested, BWB&O secured resolution of Plaintiffs’ complaint for a fraction of what had previously been sought. Finally, BWB&O was able to secure a dismissal of the remaining indemnity-based causes of action in the cross-complaint and fully extract the client from the matter. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP