BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominiums expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California multi family housing expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California tract home expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California
    Anaheim California construction project management expert witnessAnaheim California delay claim expert witnessAnaheim California civil engineering expert witnessAnaheim California expert witness commercial buildingsAnaheim California construction claims expert witnessAnaheim California building envelope expert witnessAnaheim California construction defect expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211

    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501
    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355
    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535
    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anaheim, California Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Anaheim's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Acuity v. Kinsale Insurance Company: Co-Carrier Obligations and Subrogation under Colorado Law

    November 21, 2025 —
    In Acuity v. Kinsale Insurance Company, 750 F. Supp. 3d 1229 (D. Colo. 2024), the United States District Court for the District of Colorado addressed the duties and rights of multiple insurers that issued commercial general liability (“CGL”) policies to the same insured. The decision clarifies how subrogation and contribution apply when one carrier funds a settlement and another refuses to participate. Background Phipps Construction Company served as the general contractor for the construction of a retirement community in Lakewood, Colorado. Phipps subcontracted the stucco work to Monarch Stucco, Inc. When the project owner, BMSH I Lakewood CO LLC, alleged construction defects, it brought an arbitration action against Phipps. Phipps in turn filed a third-party claim against Monarch, alleging defective and cracking stucco on fifteen buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized Among the Top 10 Largest Law Firms in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal for the Ninth Consecutive Year

    April 27, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its Orange County office has been named the eighth largest law firm in Orange County on the Orange County Business Journal’s 2026 List of Law Firms. The office has been ranked among the top 10 largest law firms in the region by the Orange County Business Journal for nine consecutive years. “We are proud to once again be recognized among the top law firms in Orange County,” said Jonathan E. Frank, managing partner of the firm’s Orange County office. “This recognition is a testament to the outstanding attorneys and professionals in our Orange County office and the clients who trust us with their most important matters. Being ranked among the top 10 largest firms in the region for nine consecutive years reflects both the strength of our team and our deep commitment to serving the Orange County business community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Balancing the Right to Repair With Evidence Preservation in Construction Defect Litigation

    April 20, 2026 —
    Every major construction project comes with risk, whether it’s a warehouse build, a multifamily development or a major renovation. Parties tend to be aligned when things are proceeding as planned. But when something goes wrong—cracked concrete, water intrusion, systems that don’t perform as expected—those interests can quickly diverge. Property owners are often caught in the middle when construction defects surface. They’re expected to act quickly to limit damage and costs. But they also have legal obligations to preserve evidence and allow potentially responsible parties, such as contractors or designers, to observe testing, demolition and repairs. Additionally, owners often have duties to lenders and investors to fix problems promptly and pursue claims against those responsible. Meanwhile, contractors and other parties have obligations of their own—not to interfere with repairs and not to delay mitigation efforts while investigations are underway. What follows will examine how those competing responsibilities play out in construction defect disputes. Reprinted courtesy of Benton Wheatley & Anna Spicer, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    PSA: Getting the First Mechanic’s Lien on a Project is a Plus

    January 26, 2026 —
    As those that read this construction law blog are aware, I am a big fan of mechanic’s liens as a way to get paid. These powerful and tricky beasts are a great way to get an owner’s attention and to put payment pressure on those that owe you money. Recently I was reminded that getting a lien prepared and recorded both carefully and quickly can be key to getting paid on a problem project. Not only should construction professionals keep the 150-day rule and the 90-day rule in mind, but they should also be quick on the trigger when it becomes clear that a mechanic’s lien will be necessary. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Quick Note: Include Key Time Related Facts in Contract to Avoid an Ambiguity

    February 17, 2026 —
    When drafting or negotiating a contract, it is important to consider key time-related facts. In other words, if there are important provisions dealing with time, you don’t want to leave them undefined as that can create an ambiguity in the contract. In a recent case dealing with an investment contract, discussed here, that’s exactly what happened. The contract allowed investors to exercise an option to return their equity in exchange for a refund of their investment but the contract didn’t contain an expiration date on when the option must be exercised. The investors tried to exercise the option two years later leading to a dispute as to whether that was a “reasonable time.” This is because the lack of clarity regarding this temporal fact led to a latent ambiguity meaning it was a question of fact as to whether the investors exercising the option two years later was reasonable under the circumstances. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Quick Note: If You Want to Recover Attorney’s Fees In a Contractual Dispute, Include a Prevailing Party Attorney’s Fees Provision

    January 21, 2026 —
    If you want the ability to recover attorney’s fees in the event of a contractual dispute, include a prevailing party attorney’s fees. Negotiate this point on the front end. Not doing so will hinder your ability to make the argument that you should be entitled to attorney’s fees due to a breach of the contract. In a recent case, the prevailing party relied on an indemnification provision to create the argument for attorney’s fees even though the action had NOTHING to do with indemnity. This was shot down on appeal as a party can’t use an indemnification provision to create that attorney’s fees argument UNLESS the provision is expressly clear on this point. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Snell & Wilmer Named Among the “Most Admired Law Firms to Work For” by Los Angeles Business Journal

    December 22, 2025 —
    LOS ANGELES – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce that its Los Angeles office has again been named to the Los Angeles Business Journal’s 2025 “Most Admired Law Firms to Work For.” The list highlights outstanding law fi­rms in the L.A. area that are consciously working towards creating diverse, positive, and supportive environments to help drive the success of their attorneys. Firms appearing on the list were judged on company culture, employee benefit and support programs, as well as diversity and women’s initiatives. “We are honored to be recognized once more as one of the ‘Most Admired Law Firms to Work For’ by the Los Angeles Business Journal”, said Joshua Schneiderman, managing partner of the firm’s Los Angeles office. “Our focus remains on building a workplace where people feel supported, encouraged to grow, and connected to their colleagues, clients, and communities. We are committed to investing in programs, relationships, and opportunities that create long lasting career fulfillment.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of California Subcontractor Gets a Kick in the Rear (or Perhaps the Front) for Prematurely Recorded Mechanics Lien

    Renters Trading Size for Frills Fuel U.S. Apartment Boom

    Limiting Liability: Three Clauses to Consider in your Next Construction Contract

    Six Reasons to Use Regular UAV Surveys on Every Construction Project

    Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology

    Toward Increased Citizen Engagement in Urban Planning

    Certificates of Merit: Is Your Texas Certificate Sufficient?

    The Right to Repair Act Means What it Says and Says What it Means

    Substitute Materials — What Are Your Duties? What Are Your Risks? (Law Note)

    When Are General Conditions and General Requirements Covered by Builder's Risk

    Revised Cause Identified for London's Wobbling Millennium Bridge After Two Decades

    New York Appeals Court Rekindles the Spark

    US Homes Face Costly Retrofits for Induction Stoves, EV Chargers

    Haight Attorneys Selected to 2018 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Properly Trigger the Performance Bond

    Contractor Given a Wake-Up Call for Using a "Sham" RMO/RME

    Nevada Insureds Can Rely on Extrinsic Facts to Show that An Insurer Owes a Duty to Defend

    Cross-Office Team Secures Litigation Stay and Order of Arbitration on Behalf of Hotel Developer

    Jarred Reed Named to the National Black Lawyers’ “Top 40 Under 40” List for Second Consecutive Year

    Vallagio v. Metropolitan Homes: Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Declarant Consent Provision to Amend Arbitration Out of Declarations

    First Circuit Broadly Interprets Exclusion in Commercial General Liability Policy Under Current Massachusetts Law

    Reversing Itself, West Virginia Supreme Court Holds Construction Defects Are Covered

    Preservationists Want to Save Penn Station. Yes, That Penn Station.

    Immigrants, Accidents and Lawsuit Loans: Does NY Need New Rules?

    Noteworthy Construction Defect Cases for 1st Qtr 2014

    Labor Intensive

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Unconditional Waiver and Release on Progress Payment Form Used in California Construction

    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    Home Building Mergers and Acquisitions 2014 Predictions

    Winning Construction Disputes: Strategic Negotiation for Better Outcomes

    Are COVID-19 Claims Covered by Builders Risk Insurance Policies?

    Contractor Jailed for Home Repair Fraud

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    The Biggest Thing Keeping Young Homebuyers out of the Market Isn't Student Debt

    California Restricts Principles of “General” Personal Jurisdiction

    Kahana Feld Attorney Andrea Vosough Named to 2026 Claims and Litigation Management Alliance (CLM) Phenoms Under 40 List

    Construction Defects #10 On DBJ’s Top News Stories of 2015

    When Business is Personal: Negligent and Intentional Interference Claims

    Quick Note: Do Your Homework When it Comes to Selecting Your Arbitrator

    Tennessee Court: Window Openings Too Small, Judgment Too Large

    Colorado HB 13-1090: Concerning Payment of Amounts Due Under a Construction Agreement

    Fourth Circuit Rejects Application of Wrap-Up Exclusion to Additional Insured

    Application Of Two Construction Contract Provisions: No-Damages-For-Delay And Liquidated Damages

    Emerging Issues in Construction CGL Insurance Part 1: Continuing or Progressive Loss Exclusions

    Sanctions of $1.6 Million Plus Imposed on Contractor for Fabricating Evidence

    I’m Sorry, So Sorry: Legal Implications of Apologies and Admissions of Fault for Delaware Healthcare Professionals

    Virginia Chinese Drywall and pollution exclusion

    The Future of Airport Infrastructure in a Post-Pandemic World

    Construction Defect Claims Not Covered

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 28 Years of Service!
    "/bhastory.php?cdjs=753181620">How Wildfires Upended California’s Insurance Market

    Virtual Jury Trials of Construction Disputes: The Necessary Union of Both Sides of the Brain

    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Recognized as Largest Litigation Presence in Sacramento

    Defending OSHA and a Call to Action Against Funding Cuts

    Client Alert: California’s Unfair Competition Law (B&P §17200) Preempted by Federal Workplace Safety Law

    ASCE Statement on Congress Passage of WRDA 2024

    New Jersey Senate Advances Bad Faith Legislation

    Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Judgment in Landis v. Fannin Builders

    Insurer Must Produce Documents After Failing To Show They Are Confidential

    ARUP, Rethinking Green Infrastructure

    Denial of Coverage for Bulge in Wall Upheld

    Bridging the Information Gap of Alternative Delivery Methods on Public Projects

    The Basics of Subcontractor Defaults – Key Considerations