BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Rockdale Illinois condominiums expert witness Rockdale Illinois high-rise construction expert witness Rockdale Illinois industrial building expert witness Rockdale Illinois hospital construction expert witness Rockdale Illinois custom homes expert witness Rockdale Illinois low-income housing expert witness Rockdale Illinois mid-rise construction expert witness Rockdale Illinois townhome construction expert witness Rockdale Illinois housing expert witness Rockdale Illinois office building expert witness Rockdale Illinois Subterranean parking expert witness Rockdale Illinois landscaping construction expert witness Rockdale Illinois retail construction expert witness Rockdale Illinois institutional building expert witness Rockdale Illinois structural steel construction expert witness Rockdale Illinois multi family housing expert witness Rockdale Illinois tract home expert witness Rockdale Illinois condominium expert witness Rockdale Illinois concrete tilt-up expert witness Rockdale Illinois casino resort expert witness Rockdale Illinois Medical building expert witness Rockdale Illinois
    Rockdale Illinois stucco expert witnessRockdale Illinois construction code expert witnessRockdale Illinois architecture expert witnessRockdale Illinois construction expert witnessesRockdale Illinois building expertRockdale Illinois defective construction expertRockdale Illinois expert witness roofing
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Rockdale, Illinois

    Illinois Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB4873 Pending: The Notice and Opportunity to Repair Act provides that a construction professional shall be liable to a homeowner for damages caused by the acts or omissions of the professional and his or her agents, employees, or subcontractors. This bill requires the service of notice to the professional of the complained-of defect in the construction by the homeowner prior to commencement of a lawsuit. Allows the professional to make an offer of repair or settlement and to rescind this offer if the claimant fails to respond within 30 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Rockdale Illinois

    No state license required for general contracting. License required for roofing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Southern Illinois
    Local # 1466
    PO Box 510
    Cobden, IL 62920

    Rockdale Illinois Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Southwest Illinois
    Local # 1468
    6100 W Main St
    Maryville, IL 62062

    Rockdale Illinois Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Effingham Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 1423
    PO Box 1323
    Effingham, IL 62401

    Rockdale Illinois Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Springfield Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 1470
    3921 Pintail Dr Ste B
    Springfield, IL 62711

    Rockdale Illinois Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Illinois
    Local # 1400
    112 W Edwards Street
    Springfield, IL 62704

    Rockdale Illinois Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Metro Decatur Home Builders Association
    Local # 1435
    PO Box 1166
    Decatur, IL 62525

    Rockdale Illinois Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Quincy
    Local # 1460
    PO Box 3615
    Quincy, IL 62305
    Rockdale Illinois Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Rockdale Illinois


    Contractors: Consult Your Insurance Broker Regarding Your CGL Policy

    Dust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from Policy

    San Francisco House that Collapsed Not Built to Plan

    Colorado Introduces Construction Defect Bill for Commuter Communities

    California Imposes New Disabled Access Obligations on Commercial Property Owners

    Changes to Arkansas Construction and Home Repair Laws

    Colorado Senate Revives Construction Defects Reform Bill

    Iowa Apartment Complex Owners Awarded Millions for Building Defects

    How Mushrooms Can Be Used To Make Particle Board Less Toxic

    Louisiana 13th in List of Defective Bridges

    High School Gym Closed by Construction Defects

    Coverage for Construction Defect Barred by Contractual-Liability Exclusion

    Duty to Defend Bodily Injury Evolving Over Many Policy Periods Prorated in Louisiana

    Unfortunate Event Test Leads to Three Occurrences

    Louisiana Court Applies Manifestation Trigger to Affirm Denial of Coverage

    Beyond the Disneyland Resort: Dining

    White and Williams Elects Four Lawyers to Partnership, Promotes Six Associates to Counsel

    Health Officials Concerned About Lead-Tainted Dust Created by Detroit Home Demolitions

    The Air in There: Offices, and Issues, That Seem to Make Us Stupid

    Renters ‘Sold Out’ by NYC Pensions Press Mayor on Housing

    Cincinnati Goes Green

    Judgment for Insured Upheld After Insurer Rejects Claim for Hurricane Damage

    Florida Chinese drywall, pollution exclusion, “your work” exclusion, and “sistership” exclusion.

    Is Arbitration Always the Answer?

    Staten Island Villa Was Home to Nabisco 'Nilla' Wafer Inventor

    Part I: Key Provisions of School Facility Construction & Design Contracts

    Will the Hidden Cracks in the Bay Bridge Cause Problems During an Earthquake?

    Party Loses Additional Insured Argument by Improper Pleading

    General Release of Contractor Upheld Despite Knowledge of Construction Defects

    The Most Expensive Travel Construction Flops

    The Miller Act Explained

    Occurrence-Based Insurance Policies and Claims-Made Insurance Policies – There’s a Crucial Difference

    Drones Used Despite Uncertain Legal Consequences

    Judge Tells DOL to Cork its Pistol as New Overtime Rule is Blocked

    Waive Not, Want Not: Waivers and Releases on California Construction Projects

    Fed Inflation Goal Is Elusive as U.S. Rents Stabilize: Economy

    Not Just Another Client Alert about Cyber-Risk and Effective Cybersecurity Insurance Regulatory Guidance

    Agree to Use your “Professional Best"? You may Lose Insurance Coverage! (Law Note)

    Housing Starts Plunge by the Most in Four Years

    Contractor Pleads Guilty to Disadvantaged-Business Fraud

    U.S. State Adoption of the National Electrical Code

    Long-Planned Miami Mega Mixed-Use Development Nears Initial Debut

    Firm Offers Tips on Construction Defects in Colorado

    Hawaii Federal District Court Denies Motion for Remand

    Connecticutt Class Action on Collapse Claims Faces Motion to Dismiss

    California Mediation Confidentiality May Apply to Third Party “Participants” Retained to Provide Analysis

    Cleveland Condo Board Says Construction Defects Caused Leaks

    Bought a New Vacation Home? I’m So Sorry

    Don MacGregor of Bert L. Howe & Associates Awarded Silver Star Award at WCC Construction Defect Seminar

    Sinking S.F. Tower Prompts More Lawsuits
    Corporate Profile

    ROCKDALE ILLINOIS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Rockdale, Illinois Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Rockdale, Illinois

    Carolinas Storm Damage Tally Impeded by Lingering Floods

    October 09, 2018 —
    As October rolls in, slow-moving flood crests and sluggish drainage persisting weeks after the passage of Hurricane Florence are leaving large eastern areas in the affected states too inundated for accurate damage assessments. The extent of damage is still largely uncalculated. In some cases, it’s believed to be worsening. Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record and Tom Sawyer, Engineering News-Record Mr. Parsons may be contacted at sawyert@enr.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Environmental Law Violations: When you Should Hire a Lawyer

    October 09, 2018 —
    Environmental law violations can have an enormous impact on your ongoing profitability. Environmental law is complicated and multifaceted, with laws at the local, state, and federal level often overlapping. In this article, we’ll discuss environmental law violations in the context of defending against an environmental law claim. In doing so, we’ll take a brief look at what environmental law is, and explore some environmental law violations cases. This should shed some light on the complex nature of environmental law litigation, and highlight the importance of securing legal representation with the scope and breadth of practice to wade into an environmental law violation case. What is Environmental Law? Before diving into specific environmental law violation cases, it is helpful to first provide a basic outline of what environmental law is and what different levels of environmental law exist in the United States. The most well-known environmental law exists at the federal level and is enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA is responsible for enforcing directives that have been set forth by Congress over time. These include a variety of Acts, including the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara

    Don’t Just Document- Document Right!

    February 06, 2019 —
    I have stated to clients on many occasions that paper is a lawyer’s best friend. Because of a recent case from the Virginia Supreme Court, I should modify that to the correct paper is a lawyer’s best friend. In Commonwealth v. AMEC Civil, LLC, AMEC sued the Virginia Department of Transportation (“VDOT”) seeking more than $21 million in damages. The Mecklenburg County Circuit Court granted AMEC almost all of its damages and found that AMEC’s notice of intent to make a claim was proper under the Virginia Code even if it was not in the proper form. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Eleventh Circuit Reverses Attorneys’ Fee Award to Performance Bond Sureties in Dispute with Contractor arising from Claim against Subcontractor Performance Bond

    February 27, 2019 —
    On October 26, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (the “Eleventh Circuit”) issued a decision which reversed an award of prevailing party attorneys’ fees to performance bond sureties in their dispute with a contractor arising from the contractor’s claim against a subcontractor’s performance bond. Had the lower court’s decision been affirmed, the performance bond sureties would have been able to recover prevailing party attorneys’ fees against the contractor even though they were not parties to the underlying subcontract and the subcontract did not contain a prevailing party attorneys’ fee provision. The underlying case is complicated and arose from the construction of Brickell CityCentre in Miami. Americaribe-Moriarty JV (the “Contractor”) asserted a claim against a performance bond procured by a defaulted subcontractor and issued by International Fidelity Insurance Company and Allegheny Casualty Company (collectively, the “Sureties”). The Sureties filed a declaratory judgment action against the Contractor in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (the “District Court”), seeking a declaration that the Contractor failed to perfect its claim against the performance bond. Reprinted courtesy of Gary M. Stein, Peckar & Abramson and K. Stefan Chin, Peckar & Abramson Mr. Stein may be contacted at gstein@pecklaw.com Mr. Chin may be contacted at kschin@pecklaw.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Owners Bound by Arbitration Clause on Roofing Shingles Packaging

    December 04, 2018 —
    In today’s age, you are probably familiar with terms such as a shrinkwrap contract (terms and conditions), which is a boilerplate contract included with a retained product, or a clickwrap contract (terms and conditions), which is generally a boilerplate contract that is digitally accepted when purchasing software or an electronic product. These are are boilerplate terms from manufacturers or vendors of products or software. Arbitration provisions in these types of agreements have generally found to be enforceable. In the recent ruling by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Dye v. Tamko Building Products, Inc., 2018 WL 5729085 (11th Cir. 2018), the court held that an arbitration provision included in a product-purchase limited warranty agreement on the package of every roofing shingles binds a homeowner to arbitrating disputes over the opened and retained product with the manufacturer, irrespective of whether the shingles were purchased by an owner’s roofer. The shingles do not have to be purchased and opened by the owner for the arbitration provision to apply. If the roofer uses or retained the shingles for purposes of the owner’s home, such knowledge of the product-purchase limited warranty agreement on the packaging of the shingles is imputed to the owner (end-user of the shingles). Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Teaching An Old Dog New Tricks: The Spearin Doctrine and Design-Build Projects

    October 30, 2018 —
    The United States District Court for the Southern District of California has now held that the Spearin doctrine applies to design-build subcontractors where the subcontractor is expected to design a portion of their work. The case is United States for the use and benefit of Bonita Pipeline, Inc., et al. v. Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC, et al. (“Bonita Pipeline”) (Case No. 3:16-cv-00983-H-AGS). In Bonita Pipeline, a subcontractor sued the general contractor and its sureties alleging breach of contract, breach of implied warranty, declaratory relief, and recovery under the Miller Act. The subcontractor then filed a motion for partial summary judgment against the general contractor on its declaratory relief cause of action, seeking a finding that the general contractor could not shift legal responsibility for its defective plans and specifications to the subcontractor. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of John Castro, Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani
    Mr. Castro may be contacted at jcastro@grsm.com

    Bond Principal Necessary on a Mechanic’s Lien Claim

    October 23, 2018 —
    As anyone that reads this construction law blog knows, mechanic’s liens are a big part of the Virginia landscape for a construction attorney like me. One option for dealing with a mechanic’s lien here in Virginia that we have not discussed but so often is the ability to “bond off” a lien. In short, the Virginia statute allows a party to essentially substitute a bond valued at a court set multiple of the principal amount of the mechanic’s lien for the memorandum. In exchange, the lien is released of record. Any enforcement action can still proceed with security for the claimant and the property owner feeling better about things because there will be no lien on the title to the land. In many ways this process provides an easier path to resolution for both owner and claimant. First of all, the claimant does not have to deal with a bank or other interest holders in the property (though a recent case discussed below reminds us that certain other parties are necessary). Second of all, the owner does not have the cloud on the title of a mechanic’s lien that may have been filed by a subcontractor over which he has no control. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Christopher G. Hill, The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Insurer Prohibited from Bringing Separate Contribution Action in Subrogation to Rights of Suspended Insured

    January 15, 2019 —
    In Travelers Property Casualty Co. of Amer. v. Engel Insulation, Inc. (No. C085753, filed 11/30/18), a California appeals court held that an insurer may not file its own action to assert claims solely as a subrogee of a suspended corporation, where the corporation could not otherwise assert the claims on its own behalf. In Engel, a homeowners association filed a construction defect action against the developer, Westlake. Travelers defended Westlake as an additional insured on the policy of a subcontractor. After the case settled, Travelers brought a subrogation action against another subcontractor for contribution to the defense costs. However, Westlake had its corporate status suspended for failure to pay taxes, and the subcontractor moved for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Kendrick, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP and Valerie A. Moore, Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP Mr. Kendrick may be contacted at ckendrick@hbblaw.com Ms. Moore may be contacted at vmoore@hbblaw.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of