• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska custom home expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska institutional building expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska industrial building expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska tract home expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska housing expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska parking structure expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska condominiums expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska retail construction expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska townhome construction expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska Medical building expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska low-income housing expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska casino resort expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska production housing expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska custom homes expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska office building expert witness Shaktoolik Alaska
    Shaktoolik Alaska delay claim expert witnessShaktoolik Alaska engineering expert witnessShaktoolik Alaska construction expertsShaktoolik Alaska fenestration expert witnessShaktoolik Alaska expert witness roofingShaktoolik Alaska expert witnesses fenestrationShaktoolik Alaska construction expert witness public projects
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Shaktoolik, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Shaktoolik Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Shaktoolik Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Shaktoolik Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Shaktoolik Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Shaktoolik Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Shaktoolik Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Shaktoolik Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Shaktoolik Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Shaktoolik Alaska

    Candlebrook Adds Dormitories With $230 Million Purchase

    Hawaii Supreme Court Finds Excess Can Sue Primary for Equitable Subrogation

    There's No Such Thing as a Free House

    Court Clarifies Sequence in California’s SB800

    No Repeal Process for Rejected Superstorm Sandy Grant Applications

    Everybody Is Going to End Up Paying for Texas' Climate Crisis

    Construction Jobs Expected to Rise in Post-Hurricane Rebuilding

    A General Contractors Guide to Bond Thresholds by State

    One to Watch: Case Takes on Economic Loss Rule and Professional Duties

    University of California Earthquake Report Provides List of Old Concrete Buildings in LA

    Apartment Projects Fuel 13% Jump in U.S. Housing Starts

    Triable Issue of Fact Exists as to Insurer’s Obligation to Provide Coverage Under Occurrence Policy

    New Illinois Supreme Court Trigger Rule for CGL Personal Injury “Offenses” Could Have Costly Consequences for Policyholders

    Drowning of Two Boys Constitutes One Occurrence

    California Construction Bill Dies in Committee

    Invest In America Act Offers 494 Billion In Funding to U.S. Infrastructure and Millions of New Jobs

    Colorado Supreme Court to Hear Colorado Pool Systems, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al.

    Condominium Construction Defect Resolution in the District of Columbia

    When is Construction Put to Its “Intended Use”?

    Distinguishing Hawaii Law, New Jersey Finds Anti-Assignment Clause Ineffective

    Housing Inflation Begins to Rise

    No Jail Time for Disbarred Construction Defect Lawyer

    Surety Bond Now a Valid Performance Guarantee for NC Developers (guest post)

    Denial of Coverage For Bodily Injury After Policy Period Does Not Violate Public Policy

    Defense Owed for Product Liability Claims That Do Not Amount to Faulty Workmanship

    Senior Living Facility Makes Construction Defect Claims

    Texas Supreme Court to Review Eight-Corners Duty-to-Defend Rule

    Buffett’s $11 Million Beach House Is Still on the Market

    Could This Gel Help Tame the California Fires?

    Homebuilders Opposed to Potential Change to Interest on Construction Defect Expenses

    California Fire Lawyers File Suit Against PG&E on Behalf of More Than 50 Wildfire Victims

    Attorney Risks Disqualification If After Receiving Presumptively Privileged Communication Fails to Notify Privilege Holder and Uses Document Pending Privilege Determination by Court

    Additional Insured Coverage Confirmed

    Governmental Immunity Waived for Independent Contractor - Lopez v. City of Grand Junction

    Five LEED and Green Construction Trends to Watch in 2020

    Hartford Stadium Controversy Still Unresolved

    Boston Building Boom Seems Sustainable

    Insurer Not Required to Show Prejudice from an Insured’s Late Notice When the Parties Contract for a Specific Reporting Period

    Homeowners Sued for Failing to Disclose Defects

    NYC Luxury-Condo Buyers Await New Towers as Sales Slow

    Accident/Occurrence Requirement Does not Preclude Coverage for Vicarious Liability or Negligent Supervision

    Florida Contractor on Trial for Bribing School Official

    San Diego’s NFL Stadium Dream Counts on Munis for Chargers’ Home

    Federal Contractors Should Request Debriefings As A Matter Of Course

    Nine Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Recognized as Southern California Super Lawyers

    Know When Your Claim “Accrues” or Risk Losing It

    No Duty to Defend Under Pollution Policy

    The Regulations on the Trump Administration's Chopping Block

    Carwash Prosecutors Seek $1.6 Billion From Brazil Builders

    Indictments Issued in Las Vegas HOA Scam
    Corporate Profile


    The Shaktoolik, Alaska Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Shaktoolik's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Shaktoolik, Alaska

    Measure of Damages for a Chattel Including Loss of Use

    November 16, 2020 —
    In a non-construction case, but an interesting case nonetheless, the Second District Court of Appeals talks about the measure of damages when dealing with chattel (property) including loss of use damages. Chattel, you say? While certainly not a word used in everyday language, a chattel is “an item of tangible movable or immovable property except real estate and things (such as buildings) connected with real property.” Equipment, machinery, personal items, furniture, etc. can be considered chattel. With respect to the measure of damages for a chattel:
    “Where a person is entitled to a judgment for harm to chattels not amounting to a total destruction in value,” the plaintiff may make an election out of two theories of recovery in addition to compensation for the loss of use. Badillo v. Hill, 570 So. 2d 1067, 1068 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (quoting Restatement of Torts § 928 (Am. Law Inst. 1939)). In addition to compensation for the loss of use, the plaintiff may elect either “the difference between the value of the chattel before the harm and the value after the harm” or “the reasonable cost of repairs or restoration where feasible, with due allowance for any difference between the original value and the value after repairs.” Id. (quoting Restatement of Torts § 928).
    Sack v. WSW Rental of Sarasota, LLC, 45 Fla.L.Weekly D2306a (Fla. 2d DCA 2020). Sack is a good example of a case dealing with the measure of damages with a chattel, here, an aircraft, including loss of use damages. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at

    Winter COVID-19 Relief Bill: Overview of Key Provisions

    January 04, 2021 —
    In a much needed holiday gift for businesses and individuals who continue to be affected by COVID-19, Congress finally approved a $900 billion aid package follow-up to the CARES Act (the Winter Covid-19 Relief Bill), the several trillion dollar stimulus that was enacted early in the pandemic. The bill, part of the larger annual spending bill, will hopefully be signed into law by President Trump in the coming days although the President has indicated his disappointment about the small amount of direct relief to individuals included in the bill. The bill was passed by both houses of Congress by a veto proof majority and is expected to become law whether or not the President chooses to exercise his veto power. White and Williams has and will continue to provide more detailed updates on important components of the legislation, some of which address matters beyond COVID-19-related relief and support, including a new Paycheck Protection Program and tax deductibility of expenses paid for with PPP funds, extension and expansion of the employee retention tax credit, direct payments to individuals, additional unemployment assistance, restrictions on surprise medical billing, rental assistance and extension of the eviction moratorium, education funding, vaccine distribution, testing and tracing, and other healthcare funding. In the meantime, here is a brief overview of several pieces of the legislation: Paycheck Protection Program The Winter COVID-19 Relief Bill provides for $284 billion of funding for a new round of the popular Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which was established by the CARES Act and allowed borrowers to receive forgivable loans to be used to retain employees and cover certain other basic operating expenses. New and existing businesses may participate in the program. However, eligibility for PPP Part II is more restrictive and targeted then the original PPP. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    AECOM Out as General Contractor on $1.6B MSG Sphere in Las Vegas

    January 18, 2021 —
    Developers of the $1.66-billion MSG Sphere in Las Vegas have removed AECOM as general contractor on the project and will bring construction management in-house for the 875,000-sq-ft entertainment venue, according to a Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. statement released Dec. 17. Reprinted courtesy of Doug Puppel, Engineering News-Record ENR may be contacted at Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Business Risk Exclusions Bar Faulty Workmanship Claim

    December 21, 2020 —
    The manufacturer of roofing and waterproofing systems was unsuccessful in securing coverage for alleged faulty workmanship due to the "your work" and "your product" exclusions. Siplast, Inc. v. Emplrs Mut. Cas. Co., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176539 (N.D. Texas Sept. 25, 2020). Siplast was sued in New York by the Archdiocese for work done at Cardinal Spellman High School. The Archdiocese purchased a Siplast Roof System for the high school. Vema Enterprises installed the roof system. The roof system was covered by a guarantee. After completion, school officials noticed water damage in the ceiling tiles throughout the school. A consultant hired by the Archdiocese concluded that the leaks were caused by the workmanship and the materials that were compromising the entire roof membrane and system. Siplast determined the guarantee was not applicable. The Archdiocese informed Siplast that it would repair the roof and hold Siplast liable for the costs. Siplast gave notice of the claim to Employers, but coverage was denied. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at

    CalOSHA Updates its FAQ on its COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Regulations

    March 22, 2021 —
    As we reported in early December, CalOSHA adopted emergency temporary regulations requiring, among other things, that employers implement a written COVID-19 prevention program, that notice be given by employers to employees in the event of potential COVID-19 exposure, and that employers continue to pay employees who have been exposed to COVID-19 even if the employee has no paid time off available. In conjunction with the emergency temporary regulations, CalOSHA posted a FAQ on the emergency regulations. On February 26, 2021, CalOSHA updated its FAQ. Among other things, the updated FAQ updates the following sections of the FAQ:
    • Scope of Coverage: Clarifies that the emergency regulations apply even to workplaces with only one employee but that it does not apply to employees working remotely.
    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at

    Topic 606: A Retrospective Review of Revenue from Contracts with Customers

    October 12, 2020 —
    The anticipation has been building regarding implementation of the new revenue recognition standard, known as Topic 606, by private companies. Public companies have reported under Topic 606 since the beginning of 2019. For private companies, the time is now. As of January 2020, private companies became subject to Topic 606 for all entities with a year-end of Dec. 31, 2019, or subsequent. However, with the COVID-19 pandemic affecting businesses across the board, this year any company with a year-end financial statement not yet issued can defer implementation of Topic 606 until the contractors’ next year end that falls after Dec. 15, 2020. What have we learned about the impact of Topic 606, if any, on construction contractors’ financial statements? The most significant impact relates to the presentation of contract assets and contract liabilities, and the disclosures associated with Topic 606. The recording of what is known as “the cost to fulfill a contract” is another area that has been affected. PRESENTATION OF CONTRACT ASSET AND CONTRACT LIABILITY A contract asset is defined in Topic 606 as an entity’s right to consideration in exchange for goods or services the entity has transferred to a customer, conditional on something other than the passage of time. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Sisk & Robert Mercado, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Mr. Sisk may be contacted at Mr. Mercado may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Famed NYC Bridge’s Armor Is Focus of Suit Against French Company

    January 18, 2021 —
    French construction giant Vinci SA faces allegations it’s partly to blame for the degradation of the armor installed on New York City’s Kosciuszko Bridge to protect against terrorist attacks and accidents. Hardwire LLC, a Baltimore company that bid unsuccessfully on the project, previously sued one of its former executives for allegedly stealing its proprietary technology for bridge armor so he could win the contract. On Tuesday, Hardwire sought permission to add two units of Vinci to the suit, which claims damages of more than $40 million. The armor is “splitting, delaminating, and is in danger of falling off,” causing a “clear and present danger,” according to the proposed revised complaint filed in federal court in Maryland. The separation “leaves significant vulnerabilities for the bridge cable.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joel Rosenblatt, Bloomberg

    UK Court Rules Against Bechtel in High-Speed Rail Contract Dispute

    March 29, 2021 —
    The U.K. subsidiary of Bechtel Inc. has lost its legal challenge against the owner of the U.K. London-Birmingham high-speed railroad project, HS2, over its failed bid for a roughly $140-million Construction Partner (CP) contract in early 2019. Reprinted courtesy of Peter Reina, Engineering News-Record Mr. Reina may be contacted at Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of