BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Talkeetna Alaska low-income housing expert witness Talkeetna Alaska institutional building expert witness Talkeetna Alaska custom home expert witness Talkeetna Alaska condominium expert witness Talkeetna Alaska retail construction expert witness Talkeetna Alaska industrial building expert witness Talkeetna Alaska townhome construction expert witness Talkeetna Alaska multi family housing expert witness Talkeetna Alaska parking structure expert witness Talkeetna Alaska housing expert witness Talkeetna Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Talkeetna Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Talkeetna Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Talkeetna Alaska condominiums expert witness Talkeetna Alaska casino resort expert witness Talkeetna Alaska production housing expert witness Talkeetna Alaska office building expert witness Talkeetna Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Talkeetna Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Talkeetna Alaska Medical building expert witness Talkeetna Alaska tract home expert witness Talkeetna Alaska
    Talkeetna Alaska architecture expert witnessTalkeetna Alaska construction expertsTalkeetna Alaska construction cost estimating expert witnessTalkeetna Alaska engineering consultantTalkeetna Alaska stucco expert witnessTalkeetna Alaska construction expert witnessesTalkeetna Alaska construction expert witness consultant
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Talkeetna, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Talkeetna Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Talkeetna Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Talkeetna Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Talkeetna Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Talkeetna Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Talkeetna Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Talkeetna Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Talkeetna Alaska Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Talkeetna Alaska


    Will the Hidden Cracks in the Bay Bridge Cause Problems During an Earthquake?

    Prefabrication Contract Considerations

    Condominium Association Responsibility to Resolve Construction Defect Claims

    Living With a Millennial. Or Grandma.

    Repair of Part May Necessitate Replacement of Whole

    Subcontractor Not Estopped from Enforcing Lien Not Listed In Bankruptcy Petition

    Preventing Common Electrical Injuries on the Jobsite

    Dust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from Policy

    The Quiet War Between California’s Charter Cities and the State’s Prevailing Wage Law

    Updates to the CEQA Guidelines Have Been Finalized

    Strategy for Enforcement of Dispute Resolution Rights

    Legislative Update: Bid Protest Law Changes to Benefit Contractors

    BOO! Running From Chainsaw Wielding Actor then Falling is an Inherent Risk of a Haunted Attraction

    World’s Biggest Crane Lifts Huge Steel Ring at U.K. Nuclear Site

    Scarce Cemetery Space Creates Prices to Die For: Cities

    Trial Date Discussed for Las Vegas HOA Takeover Case

    Construction Defect Not an Occurrence in Ohio

    Increase in Single-Family New Home Sales Year-Over-Year in January

    Construction Law Firm Welin, O'Shaughnessy + Scheaf Merging with McDonald Hopkins LLC

    Contract Not So Clear in South Carolina Construction Defect Case

    Federal Public Works Construction Collection Remedies: The Miller Act Payment Bond Claim

    Insurers' Motion to Knock Out Bad Faith, Negligent Misrepresentation Claims in Construction Defect Case Denied

    Does the New Jersey Right-To-Repair Law Omit Too Many Construction Defects?

    White House Plan Would Break Up Corps Civil-Works Functions

    Conditional Judgment On Replacement Costs Awarded

    Designers Face Fatal Pedestrian Bridge Collapse Fallout

    The Law of Patent v Latent Defects

    Boston Construction Bands With Health Care to Fight COVID-19

    A New Hope - You Now May Have Coverage for Punitive Damages in Connecticut

    New Jersey Supreme Court Upholds $400 Million Award for Superstorm Sandy Damages

    Idaho Supreme Court Address Water Exclusion in Commercial Property Exclusion

    A Changing Climate for State Policy-Making Regarding Climate Change

    New Mandatory Bond Notice Forms in Florida

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a D+

    The Overlooked Nevada Rule In an Arena Project Lawsuit

    West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar Returns to Anaheim May 15th & 16th

    Unfortunate Event Test Leads to Three Occurrences

    Equitable Lien Designed to Prevent Unjust Enrichment

    Homeowner’s Policy Excludes Coverage for Loss Caused by Chinese Drywall

    DOD Contractors Receive Reprieve on Implementation of Chinese Telecommunications Ban

    Top 10 Cases of 2019

    Sometimes a Reminder is in Order. . .

    LEED Certified Courthouse Square Negotiating With Insurers, Mulling Over Demolition

    New Jersey’s Governor Puts Construction Firms on Formal Notice of His Focus on Misclassification of Workers as Independent Contractors

    Designed to Expose: Beware Lender Certificates

    Business Interruption Insurance Coverage Act of 2020: Yet Another Reason to Promptly Notify Insurers of COVID-19 Losses

    Proposed Florida Construction Defect Act

    The Power of Planning: Four Key Themes for Mitigating Risk in Construction

    Ackman Group Pays $91.5 Million for Condo at NYC’s One57

    First-Time Homebuyers Make Biggest Share of Deals in 17 Years
    Corporate Profile

    TALKEETNA ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Talkeetna, Alaska Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Talkeetna, Alaska

    Congratulations Devin Brunson on His Promotion to Partner!

    April 26, 2021 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is very proud to announce Devin Brunson has been promoted to the position of partner with the firm! Mr. Brunson came to BWB&O from another civil litigation firm and helped start the Denver, Colorado office along with partners Lucian Greco, John Toohey and Peter Brown. He has taken on a significant leadership role within the firm over the past several years and has been integral in growing the office to its current footprint. He is licensed to practice law in Colorado, District of Colorado, and in the U.S. District Court. His practice is focused in the areas of civil and business litigation, construction litigation, and employment law. Mr. Brunson has a diverse practice background that includes complex civil litigation and intellectual property disputes and has had the privilege of representing business owners, contractors, corporate executives, and professional athletes during the course of his career. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    A Court-Side Seat: Permit Shields, Hurricane Harvey and the Decriminalization of “Incidental Taking”

    May 31, 2021 —
    This is a brief review of some of the significant environmental (and administrative law decisions) released the past few weeks. THE U.S. SUPREME COURT On April 22, 2021, the Court decided two important administrative law cases: Carr, et al. v. Saul and AMG Capital Management v. Federal Trade Commission. Carr, et al. v. Saul In this case, the constitutionality of Social Security Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) hearing disability claims disputes was at issue. More precisely, were these ALJs selected in conformance with the Appointments Clause of the Constitution? A similar issue was litigated in the case of Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission. There, the Court held that many of the agency’s ALJs were not selected in conformance with the Appointment’s Clause. Here, the Court held that this issue could be decided by the courts without compelling the litigants to first exhaust their administrative remedies. Thousands of ALJs are employed by the federal government, and it may take some time to resolve this question for every agency. AMG Capital Management v. Federal Trade Commission In this case, the court held, unanimously, that the Commission does not presently have the authority to employ such equitable remedies as restitution or disgorgement. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury
    Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com

    New 2021 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Standards Effective February 23, 2021

    March 01, 2021 —
    The “Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys” is a document jointly promulgated by the American Land Title Association (ALTA), representing the title insurance industry, and the National Society of Professional Surveyors (NSPS), representing professional land surveyors, which describes the uniform minimum standards with which surveyors must comply when preparing a survey to be used by a title insurance company for the purpose of deleting the general survey exception from ALTA title policy forms. The first such set of standards was developed in 1962 and has since been revised 10 times. The standards are currently updated every five years and are relied on by real estate professionals, including purchasers, lenders, title insurers and their attorneys, nationwide. In October 2020, a joint committee comprising representatives of both ALTA and NSPS adopted the “2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys,” which will become effective on February 23, 2021. The significant changes between the 2021 standards and the previous 2016 standards are summarized below. Survey Matters The 2021 standards clarify that only survey-related matters must be summarized on the survey. This revision was intended to foreclose a practice common among some institutional lenders to require that the survey list all items shown in Schedule BII of the title commitment on the face of the survey regardless of whether those items may in fact be survey related. The 2021 standards also add a requirement that the surveyor include a note specifying whether the location of a right of way, easement or other survey-related matter is shown on the survey. This change incorporates common lender and purchaser requirements that were not previously enumerated in the survey standards. Reprinted courtesy of Emily K. Bias, Pillsbury and Josh D. Morton, Pillsbury Ms. Bias may be contacted at emily.bias@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Morton may be contacted at josh.morton@pillsburylaw.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Assessing Defective Design Liability on Federal Design-Build Projects

    March 22, 2021 —
    A common misconception by many government officials is that a design-builder is always responsible for every design error or omission on a design-build project. This article examines the actual liability standard applied by the courts and boards of contract appeals when a design defect arises on a federal design-build project. Background: Design-Build Contracts and the Spearin Doctrine Design-build contracts combine the design and construction elements of a construction project into one contract. Design-build contracts often include two types of specifications: design and performance. Design specifications may set forth various parameters, such as precise measurements, tolerances, and materials. In doing so, the specifications create a fixed “roadmap” governing a contractor’s performance of the project. Performance specifications, on the other hand, set forth “operational characteristics” to achieve a particular objective or standard, but generally leave the details to the contractor. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk Haire, Fox Rothschild LLP, Adam Hamilton, Fox Rothschild LLP and Dana Molinari, Fox Rothschild LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@foxrothschild.com Mr. Hamilton may be contacted at ahamilton@foxrothschild.com Ms. Molinari may be contacted at dmolinari@foxrothschild.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Lewis Brisbois Promotes 35 to Partnership

    March 15, 2021 —
    Lewis Brisbois is proud to announce the promotion of 35 of its associates to partner. With these promotions, Lewis Brisbois’ total partnership comes to 933 across its 53 offices. The diverse class of newly promoted attorneys includes 15 women, which brings the total percentage of female partners at Lewis Brisbois to 33%. Los Angeles Managing Partner Jana I. Lubert expressed her excitement about the recent promotions, stating, “On behalf of the Management Committee, I congratulate these outstanding attorneys on their achievement. They have demonstrated an exceptional level of dedication to Lewis Brisbois and to our clients, especially during this difficult past year. I am particularly proud of the diversity that exists across this group.” Similarly, San Bernardino and Chief Diversity Partner Rima M. Badawiya shared her enthusiasm over the diversity of the new partners, explaining, “This group of exceptional attorneys, who have been promoted based upon their extraordinary performance, represents the diversity that exists throughout Lewis Brisbois and our commitment to advancing those who achieve at the highest level.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Mexico City Metro Collapse Kills 24 After Neighbors’ Warnings

    May 17, 2021 —
    The collapse of a long-troubled Mexico City metro track killed 24 people and put two of President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador’s top allies in the line of fire Monday night, after a decade of safety concerns and probes surrounding the project. About 79 people were injured, Mayor Claudia Sheinbaum said Tuesday. A broken beam led to the incident on the Golden Line of the metro system, she said. An international agency and the attorney general’s office will investigate. Reprinted courtesy of Max De Haldevang, Bloomberg and Maya Averbuch, Bloomberg Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Build Me A Building As Fast As You Can

    March 15, 2021 —
    Not your average game of patty-cake! Earlier this week, New York’s First Department, Appellate Division issued its decision related to 200 Amsterdam,[1] overturning the lower court’s decision which would have required 200 Amsterdam to remove several floors of its building in order to comply with zoning. The lower court determined that the NYC Zoning Resolution did not permit a developer to utilize a portion of a tax lot to merge with a neighboring zoning lot. Known as the “gerrymandered zoning lot,” the developer of 200 Amsterdam included portions of neighboring tax lots in its zoning lot in order to transfer air rights from those portions of tax lots to be utilized in 200 Amsterdam’s 55-story development. The inclusion of partial tax lots in a zoning lot is not expressly discussed in the NYC Zoning Resolution, but was permitted by a 1978 Department of Buildings memo. While challenges to 200 Amsterdam started in 2017, the developer moved forward with the construction of its development under lawfully issued building permits. Reprinted courtesy of Jodi Stein, Sheppard Mullin and Jennifer Dickson, Sheppard Mullin Ms. Stein may be contacted at jstein@sheppardmullin.com Ms. Dickson may be contacted at jdickson@sheppardmullin.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Surviving the Construction Law Backlog: Nontraditional Approaches to Resolution

    June 07, 2021 —
    Across the construction industry, COVID-19’s impact has caused a range of problems for contractors and projects—prolonged or intermittent work shutdowns, supply chain delays, pricing increases on materials and funding shortfalls. It has also led to court closures. The legal backlog for claims and disputes means that owners and contractors are facing the option of waiting until the courts are functioning the way they were previously or utilizing alternative approaches to resolution to keep projects and businesses running. Though courts across the country reopened to some extent in the latter half of 2020, many state and federal facilities were shut down or working with a limited capability for weeks or months. The closures not only froze the progress of numerous disputes already underway, but caused new schedule, cost and COVID-19-related claims to also be held up in the same backlog that is slowly being addressed under current restricted operations. New safety measures to reduce viral transmission, including reduced usage of courtrooms, restrictions on personnel and increased cleaning and sanitizing measures, have limited the number of cases courts can handle on a daily basis and lengthened legal timelines in ways many parties had not anticipated and cannot afford. Reprinted courtesy of Jeffrey Kozek, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of