New Jersey Law Firm Announces $4 Million Settlement from Construction Site Accident
November 11, 2024 —
Greenberg Minasian, LLCWEST ORANGE, N.J., Nov. 07, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Greenberg Minasian, LLC, a personal injury law firm located in Essex County, New Jersey, has announced a $4 million settlement stemming from a roofer who suffered serious injuries after a construction site fall. Veteran trial attorney Mitchell Goldstein represented the injured client, who suffered multiple fractures and injuries, permanently affecting his ability to work.
In 2018, Robert Smith, who was 61 at the time, fell backward through or over a temporary guard rail at the American Dream Mall in East Rutherford, NJ. The 30-foot fall caused him to suffer serious injuries to his pubis, sacrum, clavicle, and humerus, leading to multiple surgeries and a hip replacement.
On behalf of his client, Mr. Goldstein brought suit against the mall developer and construction company, successfully arguing that the temporary guardrails were improperly constructed and insufficiently elevated according to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. The case was settled just two days before trial, marking a significant victory for the plaintiff and his family.
Despite the defense's attempt to argue that Mr. Smith was responsible for his fall, Goldstein was able to refute their claims, asserting that the temporary guardrail's improper construction directly led to the accident.
About Greenberg Minasian LLC
Based in West Orange, Greenberg Minasian represents clients who have been seriously injured as the result of negligence by others. The firm handles cases anywhere in New Jersey including West Orange, Jersey City, Newark, Essex County and all surrounding areas. The firm continues to achieve the highest awards for its clients and families.
Slow Down?
December 03, 2024 —
Daniel Lund III - LexologyAbsolutely not, said the Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal to a masonry subcontractor being sued for allegedly improperly refusing to honor a subcontract bid.
A general contractor preparing its overall bid for a public project in Jefferson Parish relied in the process on the defendant masonry subcontractor’s bid. After a public bid process and receiving the award of the project, the general contractor was informed by the subcontractor that it believed that the unit price form that had been supplied to the sub “contained inaccuracies.” Notwithstanding offers by the GC to endeavor to address the purported “inaccuracies” during the project, most likely by a change order, the subcontractor refused to execute its subcontract. The general contractor then awarded the masonry work to another subcontractor for $368,222 more than the original sub’s bid.
The GC filed suit – for recovery of $368,222 – against the defendant subcontractor during the course of the public project. The defendant sub objected, arguing to the court that the lawsuit was “premature.” At the heart of the prematurity argument: the sub urging that the general contractor filed suit before its right to recover damages had accrued.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Daniel Lund III, PhelpsMr. Lund may be contacted at
daniel.lund@phelps.com
A Chicago Skyscraper Cements the Legacy of a Visionary Postmodern Architect
December 31, 2024 —
Mark Byrnes - BloombergA handsome and eclectic stretch of buildings along Michigan Avenue known as “Chicago’s Front Door” offers a view that reflects the city’s status as a destination for serious architecture. Louis Sullivan and Dankmar Adler’s Auditorium Building, where a young Frank Lloyd Wright designed interiors, is right there on Grant Park; so is Daniel Burnham’s Railway Exchange, where he drew up the 1909
Plan of Chicago.
Now a glass-and-aluminum apartment tower anchors the southern end of this scene, filling in a rare gap within this landmarked
streetwall and putting a bow on the career of another heroic figure in Chicago’s architectural history: Helmut Jahn.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Mark Byrnes, Bloomberg
Real Case, Real Lessons: Understanding Builders’ Risk Insurance Limits
August 12, 2024 —
David McLain - Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLCIn the recent case of 5333 Mattress King LLC v. Hanover Insurance Company, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado provided significant insights into the limits of builders’ risk insurance policies. Mattress King LLC, a warehouse owner, faced a substantial loss when a subcontractor drove a crane over and damaged the warehouse’s concrete floor slab during construction. Despite having a builders’ risk insurance policy with Hanover Insurance Company, coverage was denied, leading to litigation.
Applicable Policy Provisions
The policy in question was a Commercial Marine/Commercial Lines Builders’ Risk insurance policy. Builders’ risk insurance is designed to cover direct physical loss to covered property during construction unless the loss is excluded or limited by the policy. Key exclusions of the policy at issue included losses caused by faulty, inadequate, or defective:
- Planning, zoning, surveying, or development
- Design, specifications, workmanship, repair, construction, renovation, remodeling, grading, or compaction
- Materials used in construction or renovation
- Maintenance of the covered property
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLCMr. McLain may be contacted at
mclain@hhmrlaw.com
Robinson+Cole’s Amicus Brief Adopted and Cited by Massachusetts’s High Court
July 31, 2024 —
Erica Whaley - Construction Law ZoneEarlier this year, the
Associated Subcontractors of Massachusetts hired Robinson+Cole attorney
Joseph Barra to submit an amicus brief to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for consideration in the appeal pending before it in
Business Interiors Floor Covering Business Trust v. Graycor Construction Co., Inc. In its June 17, 2024 decision in that case, the Court interpreted the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act, which applies to private construction projects and “requires that parties to a construction contract approve or reject payment within” an allotted time period and in compliance with certain procedures else such payments will be deemed approved. Two years ago, the Massachusetts Appeals Court, in
Tocci Building Corp. v. IRIV Partners, LLC, decided that an owner who fails to timely advise its general contractor of the reasons as to why it was withholding payment, coupled with failure to certify that such funds are being withheld in good faith, violates the Prompt Pay Act and makes the owner liable for funds owed.
[1] However, the Tocci Building Court left open the question of whether one who violates the Prompt Pay Act forfeits its substantive defenses to non-payment, such as fraud, defective work, or breach of material obligation of the contract.
The facts of Business Interiors involve a general contractor, Graycor, which subcontracted Business Interiors to perform certain flooring work for a movie theatre in Boston’s North End. When Graycor failed to formally approve, reject, or certify, in good faith, its withholding of payment of three of Business Interiors’ applications for payment as prescribed by the Prompt Pay Act, Business Interiors brought suit alleging, among other things, breach of contract. Business Interiors then moved for summary judgement arguing that Graycor’s failure to comply with the Act rendered it liable for the unpaid invoices.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Robinson + Cole
Homeowner Survives Motion to Dismiss Depreciation Claims
September 23, 2024 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe insurer's motion to dismiss claims for improper claims handling when considering implementation of depreciation was denied. Morrison v. Indian Harbor Ins. Co, et al., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115664 (S. D. W. Va. July 1, 2024).
Plaintiff's home suffered flood damage. The house was insured by Indian Harbor a surplus lines carrier that offered specialized and high risk property policies in West Virginia. Surplus lines policies were procured in West Virginia through a "surplus lines licensee." Here, Neptune Flood Inc. was the surplus lines licensee broker for Indian Harbor. Peninsula Insurance Bureau, Inc. was an administrator and loss adjuster involved in the claim.
After the flood, Plaintiff notified defendants of the damage and immediately cleaned and repaired the house. Plaintiff asserted that Neptune was given notice of the loss and one of its agents made recommendations regarding the coverage available and conveyed the information to Peninsula and Indian Harbour. Plaintiff claimed that defendants misrepresented his policy coverage and made incorrect adjustments for depreciation based on Neptune's statements and recommendations.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in “The Best Lawyers in America” & “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch” 2025 Editions
August 19, 2024 —
Wilke Fleury LLP2025 Best Lawyers & Ones to Watch
George Guthrie, Best Lawyer
Adriana Cervantes, One to Watch
Steven Williamson, Best Lawyer
Jason Eldred, One to Watch
Daniel Foster, Best Lawyer
David Frenznick, Best Lawyer
K
The G2G Year in Review: 2020Supreme Court of Washington State Upholds SFAA Position on Spearin DoctrineBarratt Said to Suspend Staff as Contract Probe ContinuesRecent Supreme Court Decision Could Have Substantial Impact on BuildersInsurance Tips for ContractorsReal Estate & Construction News Round-Up 01/26/22WSHB Expands into the SoutheastZombie Foreclosures Plaguing Various Cities in the U.S.A Performance-Based Energy Code in Seattle: Will It Save Existing Buildings?Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/21/24) – REITs Show Their Strength, Energy Prices Increase Construction Costs and CRE Struggles to Keep PaceMontana Federal District Court Finds for Insurer in Pollution Coverage DisputeNo Coverage for Foundation CollapseReal Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/17/23) – A Flop in Flipping, Plastic Microbes and Psychological Hard HatsBest Practices for Installing Networks in New BuildingsThe World’s Largest 3D-Printed Neighborhood Is Here“Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must CoverOregon Duty to Defend Triggered by Potential Timing of DamageMidview Board of Education Lawsuit Over Construction Defect RepairsNYC Airports Get $500,000 Makeover Contest From CuomoNo Damages for Delay May Not Be Enforceable in Virginia2023 Construction Law UpdateConstruction and Contract Issues Blamed for Problems at Anchorage PortConnecticut Grapples With Failing Concrete FoundationsDrought Dogs Developers in California's Soaring Housing MarketPrivacy In Pandemic: Senators Announce Covid-19 Data Privacy BillFourteen Years as a Solo!Balcony Collapses Killing Six PeopleTraub Lieberman Partner Katie Keller and Associate Steven Hollis Obtain Summary Judgment Based on Plaintiff’s Failure to Comply with Policy ConditionsSlow Down?Combating Climate Change by Reducing Embodied Energy in the Built EnvironmentAMLO Hits Back at Vulcan, Threatens to Use Environmental DecreeInsurer Springs a Leak in Its Pursuit of SubrogationComparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part IBeyond the Disneyland Resort: MuseumsIs it time for a summer tune-up?Second Month of US Construction Spending DownADP Says Payrolls at Companies in U.S. Increase 200,000Alabama Appeals Court Rules Unexpected and Unintended Property Damage is an OccurrenceOwner Can’t Pursue Statutory Show Cause Complaint to Cancel Lien… Fair Outcome?Know your Obligations: Colorado’s Statutory Expansions of the Implied Warranty of Habitability Are Now in EffectInside the Old Psych Hospital Reborn As a Home for Money ManagersTechnology and the Environment Lead Construction Trends That Will Continue Through 2019How Construction Contracts are Made. Hint: It’s a Bit Like Making SausageWhat Sustainable Building Materials Will the Construction Industry Rely on in 2020?Best Lawyers® Recognizes 38 White and Williams LawyersOn-Site Supersensing and the Future of Construction Automation – Discussion with Aviad AlmagorExcess Policy Triggered Once Retention Paid, Even if Loss Not Covered By ExcessSchool Blown Down by Wind Still Set to Open on ScheduleDefenses Raised Three-Years Too Late Estop Insurer’s Coverage DenialDefense for Additional Insured Not Barred By Sole Negligence ProvisionHappenings in and around the 2015 West Coast Casualty SeminarCourts Favor Arbitration in Two Recent Construction Dispute CasesA Court-Side Seat – Case Law Update (February 2022)Brazil’s Former President Turns Himself In to PoliceWork without Permits may lead to Problems LaterLeaning San Francisco Tower Seen Sinking From SpaceI’m Sorry Ms. Jackson, I [Sovereign Immunity] am For RealSupreme Court Finds Insurance Coverage for Intentional (and Despicable) Act of Contractor’s EmployeeSIGAR Report Finds +$15 Billion in “Waste, Fraud and Abuse” in AfghanistanEnvironmental Roundup – May 2019No Collapse Coverage Where Policy's Collapse Provisions DeletedInsurer Could Not Rely on Extrinsic Evidence to Circumvent Its Duty to DefendNew York State Legislature Passes Legislation Expanding Wrongful Death LitigationTwo Things to Consider Before Making Warranty RepairsTOP TAKE-AWAY SERIES: The 2023 Annual Meeting in VancouverWhen a Request for Equitable Adjustment Should Be Treated as a Claim Under the Contract Disputes ActTwo Worthy Insurance Topics: (1) Bad Faith, And (2) Settling Without Insurer’s ConsentNEHRP Recommendations Likely To Improve Seismic DesignReal Estate & Construction News Round-Up 04/13/22 
