Leaders in Dispute Resolution Need to Make Unbiased Decisions for Mediation to Succeed
March 31, 2026 —
Rick G. Erickson - Snell & WilmerAs a mediator helping to settle construction disputes and as an arbitrator deciding outcomes of these disputes, I found certain lessons to be especially helpful after graduating last summer from the Executive Education program at Harvard Kennedy School (HKS). The exceptional HKS curriculum included courses focused on negotiation strategies for multiparty disputes, decisive leadership during crisis, and human behavior affecting dispute resolution.
In particular, our HKS class debated the impact of cognitive bias in dispute resolution, and we studied a central theme that decision-making is universally scientific. That is, parties making decisions in dispute resolution exhibit and rely upon empirical factors that good mediators and decision makers should appreciate and understand. Bias, for example, can cause key players to discount persuasive witnesses, admissible evidence, and reliable expert opinions that influence the outcome of a construction dispute. Biased decision makers may also choose to withhold key information from the mediator, as though doing so will help rather than hurt what is supposed to be an objective and diplomatic process.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Rick G. Erickson, Snell & WilmerMr. Erickson may be contacted at
rerickson@swlaw.com
An “Agreement to Agree” Is Not a Binding Contract
January 13, 2026 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesA driving issue in a recent dispute was whether a binding contract existed simply through the selection of a proposal in response to a solicitation. Or, was there nothing more than an “agreement to agree,” which does not create a binding contract. There is an important distinction between a binding contract an an “agreement to agree.”
A Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) issued a Request for Proposals otherwise referred to as an RFP. The RFP specifically stated that the CRA and proposer will be contractually bound only if and when a written contract is executed between the parties. A proposer was notified that it was selected as the winning proposer however a written contract was never executed because the proposer was subsequently disqualified. The proposer filed a lawsuit claiming it was wrongfully disqualified and prevailed. The trial court found it was entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to a contract that had been formed when the proposer’s proposal was originally accepted.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Sacramento Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Motel Client in Unruh Act Lawsuit over Trip-and-Fall Incident
October 27, 2025 —
Lewis Brisbois NewsroomSacramento, Calif. (September 24, 2025) - Sacramento Partner Shane Singh and Associate Grace Mehta of Lewis Brisbois’ Labor & Employment and ADA Compliance & Defense Practices recently secured a defense verdict for a motel client following a three-week trial in an Unruh Act lawsuit arising from a trip-and-fall incident in 2019.
The incident in question occurred in August 2019 at the client's motel in Barstow, California. The plaintiff, an elderly woman, had alleged she booked an accessible room at the motel through an online service. Upon arrival at the motel, the motel did not have a record of the accessible room request and the only ADA accessible room at this motel was already occupied. Additionally, the accessible room had one bed and plaintiff's party desired two beds. The motel allowed the party to examine a room on the first floor with two beds. The plaintiff and her party examined the room and then accepted it for their one-night stay.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Lewis Brisbois
Seven Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2025 New York Metro Super Lawyers Lists
November 18, 2025 —
Eva Paulson - Kahana FeldNEW YORK - Oct. 30, 2025 - Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that
Tim Capowski was included in the 2025 edition of New York Metro Super Lawyers and
Sean Harriton,
Rachael Marvin,
Sarah Pavlini,
Mariah Smith,
Christopher Theobalt, and
Sofya Uvaydov were included in New York Metro Rising Stars.
2025 New York Metro Super Lawyers
Tim Capowski was awarded for his work in Appellate Law. Capowski is a partner at Kahana Feld and chair of the firm’s National Appellate Litigation & Consulting Group. He has spent the better part of three decades at the forefront of the insurance defense bar. He has litigated hundreds of appeals and thousands of motions in state and federal and appellate courts throughout New York and around the country. He handles a variety of complex litigation including catastrophic property and casualty claims, construction defect, professional liability, labor and employment law, mass torts, insurance coverage, and more.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Eva Paulson, Kahana FeldMs. Paulson may be contacted at
epaulson@kahanafeld.com
Additional Insured’s Claim for a Defense Is Dismissed
December 22, 2025 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe court dismissed the additional insured’s complaint seeking a defense against a personal injury case. Piece Mgmt., Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205589 (S.D. N. Y. Oct. 18, 2025).
The underlying plaintiff, Mustafaa Dais alleged that he was injured when a glass door collapsed onto him as he exited BJ’s Restaurant. Dais sued BJ’s seeking damages for his injuries. He later amended his complaint to add Piece Management, Inc. the property’s management company, and Narway, Inc., the company hired to install the glass door.
Under the subcontract between Piece and Narwy, Narway was required to maintain a general liability policy and to add Piece as an additional insured. Narway obtained the required policy from Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Homeowners Associations Must Prepare for Cold Season Maintenance and Repairs in Western Washington
November 21, 2025 —
Andre Egle - VF LawWashington experiences major winter storms in the Greater Puget Sound area approximately two or three times per winter. While this depends on whether the winter weather pattern is affected by either El Niño or the La Niña Pacific Ocean current, associations must prepare for storm impacts rather than scramble after a storm has hit. La Niña conditions are ongoing and are likely to persist into the winter of 2025-2026, though forecasts indicate it will remain weak. Here are some steps Homeowners Associations (HOA) can take to protect themselves.
What Proactive Steps Can a Washington HOA Take to Identify and Minimize Potential Construction or Maintenance Risks Before a Major Storm?
Knowing that the chances for heavier-than-usual rains are in the forecast, a local HOA should inspect roofs, gutters, building envelopes, and drainage systems to identify vulnerabilities to water intrusion inside the buildings or ice buildup on the outside. Trees, landscaping features, walkways, and retaining walls need to be checked for dangers like dead limbs, tripping hazards, or any signs of shifting structure. Mechanical and utility systems such as plumbing, HVAC, and exterior lighting must be inspected to ensure they have sufficient insulation, protection, and proper operation. Contractors must ensure that all active construction sites are properly secured. They should also have a plan in place to protect materials from storm damage and address any other hazardous conditions.
What Key Questions Should HOA Boards and HOA Property Managers Ask Potential Contractors to Ensure Good Workmanship and Accountability?
The following five core questions capture the essentials of a contractor’s quality, reliability, and accountability: (1) Are you licensed, bonded, insured (inquire into the policy types and the applicable limits), and able to provide references for similar HOA projects? (2) Who will manage the project on-site work (request that person’s CV or work history), and how will you communicate work progress, potential issues, and timelines to the HOA? (3) What materials, methods, and quality-control procedures will you use, and how will you protect the property while performing the work, particularly during the rainy and stormy season? (4) Can you provide a detailed, written scope of work and price estimate, and explain, in writing, your company procedures for handling change orders or unexpected conditions? (5) What warranties do you provide for labor and materials that you will be using, and how do you handle a warranty or “punch-list” issues after the job is complete?
What are Some Insurance Pitfalls HOAs Often Overlook - and How to Avoid Them?
Here are the most common insurance pitfalls that HOAs may overlook, along with proposed solutions for addressing them. Pitfall No.1: Outdated or generic replacement-cost estimates that do not reflect actual construction costs in Washington. Solution: Obtain a professional replacement-cost appraisal every 3–5 years and ensure that the policy includes full replacement cost, not actual cash value. Pitfall No.2: Misunderstanding of the division of responsibility for covered losses between the HOA and individual owners. Solution: Educate the owners that under most an HOA’s contemporary governing documents such as the Declarations Of Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (DCCRs) and the Bylaw, the association’s insurance primarily covers repairs not only to the association’s common areas and limited common areas, but also the repairs of structural and other building elements inside each individual units, and then collects from the unit owner a proportional share of the HOA’s insurance premium. That way, the repairs covered by the HOA’s property insurance are uniform, and the HOA - not the unit owner - will deal with the repair contractor and its insurer if the repairs are subpar. Pitfall No. 3: Gaps in Water Damage Coverage. Property and liability insurance policies often exclude slow leaks, sewer backups, and water intrusion - three types of claims that typically are most expensive for an HOA. Solution: To request that the HOA insurance broker add to the policy coverage of (a) a backup of sewer/drain coverage, (b) wind-driven rain, and (c) water intrusion, and (d) sudden pipe failures. Afterward, the HOA should ensure that owners consistently keep the plumbing in their units in good working order. Pitfall No. 4: Failing to Adjust Coverage After Renovations. Specifically, HOAs frequently forget to update insurance after roof replacements, building upgrades, or additions of new amenities. Solution: Notify the HOA’s insurance broker after any major capital project and update insurable values to reflect the improvements. Pitfall No. 5: Not reviewing vendor insurance requirements because contractors may frequently have inadequate coverage or let policies lapse in the middle of a construction or renovation project. Solution: At the time of contracting for the construction or renovation work at the HOA property, (i) request that contractors provide their current Certificates of Insurance (“COI”), additional insured endorsements, and insurance policies Declaration pages that show the limits or coverage, and (ii) re-verify the same insurance facts before the work begins.
What is the Best Practice for Communicating with Residents of a Community Owned by an HOA to Maintain Trust and Transparency During and After a Winter Storm?
First, before a storm, send a simple, fact-based, expectation-setting message outlining what the HOA will do (snow removal plans, inspections, vendor readiness) and what residents should be prepared to do. Utilize multiple channels, including email, text alerts, HOA portal, lobby postings, and social media (if applicable). Second, set realistic expectations about response times because trust is built when residents understand what the HOA can and cannot do. Share with residents: (a) snow/ice vendor schedules; (b) priority areas, e.g., roads, walkways, private drives; (c) any delays due to the severity of the weather, and (d) clear expectations meant to reduce the residents’ frustration. Third, provide regular updates, even if the update is “no change.” Residents want visibility and care, not perfection. Report: (i) storm status; (ii) timing of plow/ice treatment timing, (iii) any emerging hazards (e.g., downed branches, icy walkways), and (vi) instructions for safety or temporary restrictions on moving about the community. Fourth, keep a record of and clarify every step taken to address the storm’s impact, since being transparent helps build trust when residents see that the HOA operates in an organized and responsible manner. After each key action, such as plowing, salting, emergency repairs, and the like, share with residents a brief update stating (a) what was done, (b) when it was complete, (c) the name of the vendor that performed the work, and (d) the dangers that are yet to be addressed. Fifth, within 48 to 72 hours after the storm, call a meeting to conduct a post-event summary to discuss what worked well, what challenges the HOA had to deal with, what repairs or follow-up work will happen, and what improvements will be made to meet the next storm with a higher degree of preparedness. Such a meeting would be one of the strongest ways to build long-term trust in the residents of the community owned by the HOA.
Andre Egle is an attorney at
VF Law. He may be reached at andre.egle@vf-law.com.
Application of Ordinance and Law Coverage in Property Insurance Policy and Twenty-Five Percent Rule
December 08, 2025 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesA recent case involved a homeowner’s all-risk property insurance policy with ordinance and law coverage. This ordinance and law coverage required the carrier “to cover costs that the [insureds] incur as a result of any ordinance that requires them to replace ‘the portion of the undamaged part of a covered building or other structure necessary to complete the remodeling, repair or replacement of that part of the covered building or other structure damaged by a Peril Insured Against.” Weston v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 50 Fla.L.Weekly D2307a (Fla. 2d DCA 2025). The property insurance policy required the insurer to pay the actual cash value of the loss, minus any deductible, and “any remaining amounts necessary to perform such repairs as work is performed and expenses are incurred.” Id.
Here, the insureds sustained roof damage from a storm. The insureds had an expert that opined, with a reasonable degree of certainty, that the entire roof needed to be replaced because “[t]here was damage to more than twenty-five percent of the roof, and the Florida Building Code provided that if more than twenty-five percent of the roof was damaged, then the entire roof should be replaced.” Weston, supra. The insureds also had an expert that testified to an estimate- the replacement cost of the damage as well as the actual cash value of that damage.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin NorrisMr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Reckless Disregard is. . . Well. . .Reckless
December 30, 2025 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsPunitive damages are hard to come by in construction law cases. This is because almost all construction contract cases are exactly that: contract cases. Between the
economic loss rule and the Virginia Courts’
almost (though not completely) impregnable wall between tort and contract, punitive damages may seem completely out of the picture. Depending on your perspective and position on the construction project food chain, this fact can be either frustrating or comforting.
However, like all seemingly immutable laws, this one has an exception according to the Chesapeake County, Virginia Circuit Court. In
Sawyer v. C.L. Pincus Jr. & Co. et. al. this Virginia court was faced with the following scenario. The defendants, a church and its contractor, were sued by Sawyer over a construction swale that was built partly on Sawyer’s property. According to the plaintiff, the only permission they gave to their neighbors at the church was to allow the church to build a drainage berm that did not encroach on their property. As stated above, the church and its contractor built a swale that encroached on the Sawyers’ property.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
