Word of the Day: “Contractor”
September 16, 2024 —
Garret Murai - California Construction Law BlogWhat’s in a word? When it comes to insurance policies, a word, can potentially mean millions of dollars.
In
California Specialty Insulation, Inc. v. Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company, 102 Cal.App.5th 1 (2024), an insured and its insurer battled it out over the word “contractor,” and whether an exclusion from coverage of bodily injury to any employee or temporary worker “of any contractor or subcontractor,” excluded a personal injury claim brought by an employee of a general contractor against a subcontractor.
The California Specialty Contractor Case
In 2017, Air Control Systems, Inc. (“Air Control”) was contracted to perform improvements at a building in Los Angeles, California. Air Control in turn subcontracted with California Specialty Insulation, Inc. (“CSI”) to install duct insulation on the project.
During construction, an employee of Air Control was injured when he fell 16 to 20 feet from a ladder that was struck by a scissor lift driven by an employee of CSI. Approximately two years later the Air Control employee filed a personal injury lawsuit against CSI.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
Five Issues to Consider in Government Contracting (Or Any Contracting!)
September 02, 2024 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesThe appeal of Appeals of – Konecranes Nuclear Equipment & Services, LLC, ASBCA 62797, 2024 WL 2698011 (May 7, 2024) raises interesting, but important, issues that should be considered. In this case, the government (in a supply contract) procured four portal cranes from the claimant. After an initial test of one of the cranes failed, the government refused to accept delivery even after the issue was addressed by the claimant. The government did not accept the manner in which the claimant addressed the issue and would only accept cranes if the claimant employed “an unnecessary alternative solution [that] caused further delay and increased [claimant’s] costs.” On appeal, it was determined the government’s decision to delay delivery based on its demand for the alternative solution was not justified, i.e., constituted a breach of contract. Below are five issues of consideration in government contracting, or, for that matter, any contracting.
Issue #1- Patently Ambiguous Specifications
The government argued that the specifications were patently ambiguous and because the claimant failed to inquire regarding the ambiguous specifications prior to performance, its interpretation of the ambiguous specifications should govern. The contractor countered that the specifications were unambiguous and it met the specifications.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Construction Defect Disputes: Know Your Measure of Damages!!!!!
January 21, 2025 —
David Adelstein - Florida Construction Legal UpdatesRemember this: know your measure of damages in a construction defect dispute. If you don’t, as shown below, the outcome can be unforgiving. The measure of damages is one of your most important elements of proof. You are filing suit for damages; thus, knowing what you can reasonably recovery is paramount.
In a recent dispute, Bandklayder Development, LLC v. Sabga, 50 Fla.L.Weekly D91e (Fla. 3d DCA 2025), a residential developer sold a single-family house while it was under construction in an as-is purchase agreement. Post-closing, the purchasers claimed defects and served a Florida Statutes Chapter 558 notice of construction defects letter. The purchaser subsequently initiated a construction defect lawsuit. During the nonjury trial, the purchaser’s expert testified that the purchasers suffered damages approximating $323,000 calculated as of January 19, 2022 (which was the date of the expert’s report). The expert further testified that the cost to finish the incomplete/defective work increased by 35% at the date of the May 2023 trial. However, the expert never testified as to the amount of damages as of the date of the contractual breach, which at the latest, would have been in April 2018 when the notice of construction defects letter was sent (or, at its earliest, June 2017 when closing occurred). At trial, the judge entered judgment for the purchasers in the amount of about $425,0000. This was reversed on appeal with judgment to be entered in favor of the developer. Why? Because the purchasers employed the wrong measure of damages and the only thing that prevented them from introducing the right measure of damages was within their control. Harsh outcome for not applying the correct measure of damages!
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at
dma@kirwinnorris.com
Snooze You Lose? Enforcement of Notice and Timing Provisions
November 11, 2024 —
Cornelius F. "Lee" Banta, Jr. - ConsensusDocsDeadlines are an inescapable part of the construction industry. Bid deadlines. Submittal deadlines. Material delivery deadlines. Substantial completion. Final completion. And so, inevitably, fighting about deadlines becomes a necessary byproduct. Was the deadline really a deadline? Was the schedule slippage on the critical path? Should there be an equitable extension to the date of substantial completion? Given the amount of attention and concern conferred on deadlines, those drafting construction contracts naturally seek to clarify which deadlines really matter with the inclusion of notice and timing provisions.
A contract’s change order and claims procedures are often a key friction point for those drafting and administering the contract. Should there be a requirement for prior written notice of a claim for cost/time relief? How much advance notice? Who should the request be sent to? Is a specific form of notice required? What are the consequences of failing to provide timely notice? A practitioner should pay careful attention to negotiating these terms on the front end, because rest assured, these contract provisions will garner scrutiny when a change order dispute boils over.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Cornelius F. "Lee" Banta, Jr., Peckar & Abramson, P.C.Mr. Banta may be contacted at
lbanta@pecklaw.com
Owners and Contractors are Liable for Injuries Caused by their Independent Contractors under the “Peculiar Risk Doctrine”
October 15, 2024 —
William L. Porter - Porter Law GroupMany contractors and owners believe that if they hire an independent contractor to perform work and that independent contractor causes injury to others during the performance of that work, then it is the independent contractor alone who will be liable for those injuries. In most circumstances, this is correct. The owner or the contractor will not be held liable for injuries caused by his or her independent contractor. However, this is not always the case.
Under the “Peculiar Risk Doctrine” and California cases interpreting the doctrine, a contractor or owner who hires an independent contractor to do work which is considered to be “inherently dangerous work” can be still be held directly liable for damages when that independent contractor causes injury to others by negligently performing the work.
Such liability can generally be imposed on the one hiring the independent contractor under either of two branches of the peculiar risk doctrine. First, where a person hires an independent contractor to do inherently dangerous work, but fails to provide in the contract or in some other manner that special precautions must be taken to avert the peculiar risk of injury related to that work, then the one hiring the independent contractor can be held liable for injuries to others caused by the independent contractor’s negligence. (Restatement Second of Torts Section 413). For example, in Mackey v. Campbell Construction Co. 101 Cal. App. 3d 774, 162 Cal. Rptr. 64 (1980), Western Electric Company, the owner of the project, was found liable for the personal injuries of a subcontractor’s employee because Western’s representatives were on the job at all times, had doubts about the safety of scaffolding being used on the project, yet failed to require use of precautions that could have been taken to avoid injury.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
William L. Porter, Porter Law GroupMr. Porter may be contacted at
bporter@porterlaw.com
Rejection’s a Bear- Particularly in Construction
December 23, 2024 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsAs I read through this week’s cases published in Virginia Lawyers Weekly, I came across a case posing an interesting question. The question is, “If your bid is rejected along with everyone else’s, can you complain?” The short answer set out by the Rockingham County, Virginia Circuit Court is “No.” In the case of General Excavation v. City of Harrisonburg the Court looked at the Virginia Public Procurement Act’s bid protest provisions in Va. Code 2.2-4360 and 2.2-4364(C) in the context of General Excavation’s protest of the City’s failure to award it (or anyone else for that matter) the contract on which it was the low bidder. The controlling section of the statute allows a challenge to the award or proposed award of a contract.
In defending the action, the City of Harrisonburg argued that, because the Procurement Act waived some of the city’s sovereign immunity, it must be read strictly. The city further argued (somewhat ironically) that, because no award of the contract was given or even proposed, General Excavation could not bring suit because it would not be challenging the “proposed award or award” of a contract. Not surprisingly, the Rockingham County court held with the City and strictly construed the statute against General Excavation in finding that General Excavation did not have the standing necessary to bring suit under the statute.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
Definitions Matter in Illinois: Tenant Held Liable Only for Damage to Apartment Unit
September 09, 2024 —
Gus Sara - The Subrogation StrategistIn Phila. Indem. Ins. Co. v. Gonzalez, No. 1-23-0833, 2024 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1372, the Appellate Court of Illinois considered whether the terms of a lease agreement limited a tenant’s liability for fire damages, a fire caused by her negligence, to her apartment unit only. The plaintiff insured the subject apartment building, which incurred damage to several units as result of a fire in the tenant’s unit. The lease defined “Premises” as the specific apartment unit occupied by the tenant and held the tenant responsible for damage caused to the Premises. While the court found that the lease permitted the plaintiff to subrogate against the tenant, it held that the lease terms limited the damages to the tenant’s apartment unit only.
In Gonzalez, the plaintiff’s insured owned a multi-unit apartment building in Chicago. In September 2019, the building owner entered into a lease agreement with the defendant for apartment Unit 601. The lease stated that Unit 601 was the “Leased Address (Premises).” Another provision stated that building owner “hereby leases to Tenant(s) and Tenant(s) hereby leases from Landlord(s) for use as a private dwelling only, the Premises, together with the fixtures and appliances (if any) in the premises…” The lease also stated that “Tenant shall be liable for any damage done to the premises as a result of Tenant’s or Tenant’s invitees, guests or others authorized to
Manhattan to Get Tall, Skinny TowerDistrict Court's Ruling Affirmed in TCD v American Family Mutual Insurance Co. Quick Note: Unenforceable Language in Arbitration ProvisionInsurer Wrongfully Denies Coverage When Household Member Fails to Submit to EUODeferred Maintenance?Court of Appeals Finds Arbitration Provision Incorporated by Reference UnenforceableFifth Circuit Certifies Eight-Corners Duty to Defend Issue to Texas Supreme CourtSurplus Lines Carriers Cannot Compel Arbitration in LouisianaWhere Standing, Mechanic’s Liens, and Bankruptcy CollidePartner Denis Moriarty and Of Counsel William Baumgaertner Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2017EPA Can't Evade Enviro Firm's $2.7M Cleanup Site Pay Claim, US Court SaysCould This Gel Help Tame the California Fires?California Court of Appeal Finds Coverage for Injured Worker Despite Contractor's ExclusionFederal Court in New York Court Dismisses Civil Authority Claim for COVID-19 CoverageBHA Attending the Construction Law Conference in San Antonio, TexasL.A. Mixes Grit With Glitz in Downtown Revamp: CitiesInsurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision OneMBIA Seeks Data in $1 Billion Credit Suisse Mortgage SuitDesign-Assist Collaboration/Follow-up PostNotice and Claims Provisions In Contracts Matter…A LotZell Says Homeownership Rate to Fall as Marriages DelayedManhattan Bargain: Condos for Less Than $3 MillionOne More Thing Moving From California to Texas: Wildfire RiskCongratulations to Jonathan Kaplan on his Promotion to Partner
Home Builders and Developers Beware: SC Supreme Court Beats Up Hybrid Arbitration Clauses Mercilessly
California Court of Appeal Makes Short Work Trial Court Order Preventing Party From Supplementing Experts
10 Year Anniversary – Congratulations Greg Podolak
The Ghosts of Baha Mar: How a $3.5 Billion Paradise Went Bust
Arbitration Denied: Third Appellate District Holds Arbitration Clause Procedurally and Substantively Unconscionable
Blueprint for Change: How the Construction Industry Should Respond to the FTC’s Ban on Noncompetes
Vietnam Expands Arrests in Coffee Region Property Probe
Think Twice Before Hedging A Position Or Defense On A Speculative Event Or Occurrence
Loan Modifications Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: FDIC Answers CARES Act FAQs
Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2024 Fall Forum Meeting in Pittsburgh
Battle of Experts Cannot Be Decided on Summary Judgment
Construction Attorneys Tell DBR that Business is on the Rise
Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?
High-Rise Condominium Construction Design Defects, A Maryland Construction Lawyer’s Perspective
Tall Mass Timber Buildings Now Possible Under 2021 IBC Code Changes
A Guide to Evaluating Snow & Ice Cases
Surplus Lines Carrier Can Force Arbitration in Louisiana Despite Statute Limiting Arbitration
ASCE Statement On House Passage Of The Precip Act
False Implied Certifications in Making Payment Requests: What We Can Learn from Lance Armstrong
Candlebrook Adds Dormitories With $230 Million Purchase
French President Vows to Rebuild Fire-Collapsed Notre Dame Roof and Iconic Spire
Account for the Imposition of Material Tariffs in your Construction Contract
Suzanne Pollack Elected to Lawyers Club of San Diego 2021 Board of Directors
Evergrande’s Condemned Towers on China’s Hawaii Show Threat
Toll Brothers Climbs After Builder Reports Higher Sales
Owner’s Slander of Title Claim Against Contractor Recording Four Separate Mechanics Liens Fails Under the Anti-SLAPP Statute
New Survey Reveals Present-Day Risks of Asbestos Exposure in America - 38% in High-Risk Jobs, 47% Vulnerable through Second-Hand Exposure
Serving the 558 Notice of Construction Defect Letter in Light of the Statute of Repose
Seattle Council May Take a New Look at Micro-Housing
Economy in U.S. Picked Up on Consumer Spending, Construction
Proposed Changes to Federal Lease Accounting Standards
Ex-Detroit Demolition Official Sentenced for Taking Bribes
Despite Health Concerns, Judge Reaffirms Sentence for Disbarred Las Vegas Attorney
Tenth Circuit Finds Insurer Must Defend Unintentional Faulty Workmanship
Expansion of Statutes of Limitations and Repose in K-12 and Municipal Construction Contracts
Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (08/10/22)
Wheaton to Require Sprinklers in New Homes
Hilti Partners with Canvas, a Construction Robotics Company
Who Will Pay for San Francisco's $750 Million Tilting Tower?
Four Key Steps for a Successful Construction Audit Process
District of Oregon Predicts Oregon’s Place in “Plain Meaning” Pollution Camp
Mortgage Interest Rates Increase on Newly Built Homes
Canada Housing Surprises Again With July Starts Increase
Is Equipment Installed as Part of Building Renovations a “Product” or “Construction”?
U.S. Codes for Deck Attachment
Haight Expands California Reach – Opens Office in Sacramento
Denver Condo Development Increasing, with Caution
Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Increased 4.3% in November
Christopher Leise Recognized by US News – Best Lawyers 2022 "Lawyer of the Year"
Quick Note: Attorney’s Fees on Attorney’s Fees
