BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts structural steel construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts landscaping construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts tract home expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts multi family housing expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts custom home expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts office building expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts townhome construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts industrial building expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts housing expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts parking structure expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts mid-rise construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts low-income housing expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts Medical building expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts hospital construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts condominiums expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts casino resort expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts retail construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts custom homes expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts high-rise construction expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts Subterranean parking expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts condominium expert witness Cambridge Massachusetts
    Cambridge Massachusetts structural engineering expert witnessesCambridge Massachusetts construction project management expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts building expertCambridge Massachusetts OSHA expert witness constructionCambridge Massachusetts fenestration expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts forensic architectCambridge Massachusetts structural concrete expert
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Massachusetts Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cambridge Massachusetts

    No state license required for general contracting. Licensure required for plumbing and electrical trades. Companies selling home repair services must be registered with the state.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Central Massachusetts Inc
    Local # 2280
    51 Pullman Street
    Worcester, MA 01606

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Massachusetts Home Builders Association
    Local # 2200
    700 Congress St Suite 200
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Boston
    Local # 2220
    700 Congress St. Suite 202
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    North East Builders Assn of MA
    Local # 2255
    170 Main St Suite 205
    Tewksbury, MA 01876

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders and Remodelers Association of Western Mass
    Local # 2270
    240 Cadwell Dr
    Springfield, MA 01104

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Bristol-Norfolk Home Builders Association
    Local # 2211
    65 Neponset Ave Ste 3
    Foxboro, MA 02035

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remodelers Association of Cape Cod
    Local # 2230
    9 New Venture Dr #7
    South Dennis, MA 02660

    Cambridge Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Cambridge Massachusetts


    Sometimes It’s Okay to Destroy Evidence

    Construction Defect Case Not Over, Despite Summary Judgment

    New Jersey Federal Court Examines And Applies The “j.(5)” Ongoing Operations Exclusion

    Arizona Court Cites California Courts to Determine Construction Defect Coverage is Time Barred

    Public Housing Takes Priority in Biden Spending Bill

    From the Ground Up

    Firm Announces Remediation of Defective Drywall

    A Court-Side Seat: As SCOTUS Decides Another Regulatory “Takings” Case, a Flurry of Action at EPA

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Celebrates 21-Year Success Story

    10-story Mass Timber 'Rocking' Frame Sails Through Seismic Shake Tests

    "Repair Work" Endorsements and Punch List Work

    War-Torn Ukraine Looks to Europe’s Green Plans for Reconstruction Ideas

    Who Would Face Liability For Oroville Dam Management: Brett Moore Authors Law360 Article

    2021 Executive Insights: Leaders in Construction Law

    Melissa Pang Elected Vice President of APABA-PA Board of Directors

    The G2G Mid-Year Roundup (2022)

    First-Time Buyers Home Sales Stagnates

    Best Practices in Construction– What are Yours?

    A Survey of Trends and Perspectives in Construction Defect Decisions

    Court Concludes That COVID-19 Losses Can Qualify as “Direct Physical Loss”

    Canada Housing Surprises Again With July Starts Increase

    Tick Tock: Don’t Let the Statute of Repose or Limitations Time Periods Run on Your Construction Claims

    Insurer Must Produce Documents After Failing To Show They Are Confidential

    Rhode Island Affirms The Principle That Sureties Must be Provided Notice of Default Before They Can be Held Liable for Principal’s Default

    Giant Floating Solar Flowers Offer Hope for Coal-Addicted Korea

    Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act Enacted

    Insurer's In-House Counsel's Involvement in Coverage Decision Opens Door to Discovery

    What is a Subordination Agreement?

    Floating Crane on Job in NYC's East River Has a Storied Past of Cold War Intrigue

    Shea Homes CEO Receives Hearthstone Builder Humanitarian Award

    Seattle Condos, Close to Waterfront, Construction Defects Included

    Travelers Insurance Sues Chicago for $26M in Damages to Willis Tower

    Defense Victory in Breach of Fiduciary Action

    Homebuyers Get Break as Loan Rates Defy Fed Tapering: Mortgages

    Application of Set-Off When a Defendant Settles in Multiparty Construction Dispute

    Nevada Assembly Bill Proposes Changes to Construction Defect Litigation

    California Home Sellers Have Duty to Disclose Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Second Circuit Clarifies What Must Be Alleged to Establish “Joint Employer” Liability in the Context of Federal Employment Discrimination Claims

    Five Years of Great Legal Blogging at Insurance Law Hawaii

    Harsh New Time Limits on Construction Defect Claims

    Delay Leads to Problems with Construction Defects

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 04/13/22

    Environmental Regulatory Provisions Embedded in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

    Insured’s Bad Faith Insurance Claim Evaporates Before its Eyes

    California Superior Court Overrules Insurer's Demurrer on COVID-19 Claim

    New York Condominium Association Files Construction Defect Suit

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose at Faster Pace in January

    Duty to Defend Bodily Injury Evolving Over Many Policy Periods Prorated in Louisiana

    New York’s Lawsky Proposes Changes to Reduce Home Foreclosures
    Corporate Profile

    CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Cambridge, Massachusetts Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Cambridge's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Hawaii Supreme Court Bars Insurers from Billing Policyholders for Uncovered Defense Costs

    April 23, 2024 —
    Across the country, there is a split in authority as to whether an insurance company should be allowed to recoup defense costs where it is ultimately determined that the carrier has no duty to defend under the policy and the policy is silent as to such reimbursement. The Hawaii Supreme Court is the latest to enter the fray to address this very question, ruling in favor of policyholders in the recent case of St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Bodell Construction Company. Facts of the Case and Procedural History The Bodell case arose in response to a pair of certified questions from the US District Court for Hawaii to the Hawaii Supreme Court. The case involved a group of primary and excess insurers that sold liability policies to Bodell Construction and sought reimbursement of defense costs that the insurers had paid to defend a construction defect claim against Bodell. In the Underlying Action, the District Court ultimately ruled that the claims against Bodell Construction were not covered under the policies. Because the claims were not covered, the insurers demanded reimbursement of the defense fees from Bodell . Having determined there was no Hawaii state law on this issue, and in light of conflicting decisions in the district courts, the US District Court for Hawaii requested guidance from the Hawaii Supreme Court. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda C. Stefanatos, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Ms. Stefanatos may be contacted at AStefanatos@sdvlaw.com

    Andrea DeField Recognized In 2024 List of Influential Business Women By South Florida Business Journal

    February 19, 2024 —
    We are pleased to announce that Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP insurance coverage partner Andrea DeField was named to the South Florida Business Journal’s 2024 list of Influential Business Women. The award celebrates 25 women who have a strong record of leadership, performance and innovation in their industry, as well as meaningful community involvement. This distinction is well-deserved given Andi’s leadership in the cyber insurance space, contribution to the firm’s pro bono efforts, and longstanding record of community involvement in South Florida. Andi and the other honorees will be featured in the March 15 special issue of the South Florida Business Journal introducing the Influential Business Women of 2024. Congratulations Andi! Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Atlanta Office Wins Defense Verdict For Property Manager On Claims By Vendor, Cross-Claims By Property Owner

    January 08, 2024 —
    Atlanta, Ga. (December 18, 2023) – Atlanta Partner Adi Allushi and Associate Cecilia Walker recently secured a defense verdict for a national property management corporation on claims brought by a vendor and cross-claims lodged by the property owner. Lewis Brisbois’ client is a national corporation, over a century old, that managed over 140 properties with 40,000 units. In 2019, the client entered the Georgia market managing three apartment complexes owned by a hedge fund in New York. The owner terminated without cause the client within six months, and several vendors – including the plaintiff, who was a remedial services provider – were not paid during the last few months and the transition period. The plaintiff sued the owner for the unpaid services, as well as an incorrect entity it believed to be the client. The owner cross-claimed against the client for fraudulent misrepresentations. Based on the misnomer statute, the court granted default judgment against the client. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    The Johnstown Dam Failure, as Seen in the Pages of ENR in 1889

    April 08, 2024 —
    The small headline of the Engineering News article shown here belies the gravity of the disaster: the deadliest dam failure in U.S. history. The South Fork Dam in Pennsylvania was a 72-ft-tall, 931-ft long earth and rockfill structure. After a stop-and-start construction process over a dozen years, it was completed in 1853. The dam went through several changes of ownership and was repaired inadequately. Fish screens were installed that obstructed the spillway and caused water to overtop and erode the structure. This mass of water uprooted trees, rocks, houses, rail cars and animals as it thundered down the valley before smashing into a stone railway embankment. Fires ignited by wrecked locomotives burned for three days. The death toll was 2,208. Reprinted courtesy of Scott Lewis, Engineering News-Record Mr. Lewis may be contacted at lewisw@enr.com Read the full story...

    When OSHA Cites You

    April 22, 2024 —
    With the strong bonds that form among construction project teams, workers looking out for each other helps keep safety foremost in everyone’s mind. But sometimes, even the very best intentions alone can’t prevent an occasional misstep—a forgotten hard hat, a sagging rope line—which can and often does result in an OSHA citation. These regulatory reminders can bring unfortunate consequences: penalties, higher insurance premiums, potential worker injury claims, loss of bidding eligibility, loss of reputation and even public embarrassment, because citations are published on OSHA’s website. Due to citations’ adverse effects, contractors have incentives to minimize them. They can do this by asserting available defenses, because a citation is only an alleged violation, not a confirmed one. But making defenses available begins well before a citation is issued, well before OSHA arrives to a construction site and well before a violation even occurs. Instead, contractors’ ongoing safety programs should incorporate the necessary measures to preserve OSHA citation defenses in three key areas: lack of employee exposure, lack of employer knowledge and impossibility. EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE To sustain a citation against an employer, OSHA must not only identify an applicable standard that the company violated but also show that the violation exposed employees to hazards and risk of injury. Absent evidence of actual exposure, OSHA often makes this showing by asserting that performing job functions necessarily exposes employees to the cited hazard. Reprinted courtesy of Michael Metz-Topodas, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Mr. Metz-Topodas may be contacted at michael.metz-topodas@saul.com

    California Makes Big Changes to the Discovery Act

    March 04, 2024 —
    Beginning January of 2024, California amended the Civil Discovery Act to mirror the Federal Rules and require that any party appearing in a civil action to provide initial disclosures to any other party demanding the same. In January of 2024, California amended the Civil Discovery Act, specifically C.C.P. section 2016.090, to affirmatively require that any party appearing in a civil action to provide initial disclosures to any other party demanding the same. In an effort to reflect the Federal Rule 26 disclosure requirements, as many other States have adopted, California will now also mandate (upon demand) that a party produce evidence without an arduous and possibly duplicative effort. In other words, this initial disclosure will require a party making initial disclosures of persons or records to additionally disclose persons or records that are relevant to the subject matter of the action and to disclose information and records regarding insurance policies or contracts that would make a person or insurance company liable to satisfy a judgment. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    NY Construction Safety Firm Falsely Certified Workers, Says Manhattan DA

    March 25, 2024 —
    A New York-based construction safety firm and 25 individuals were indicted Feb. 28 for allegedly operating a bogus safety training school, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office says. The firm, Valor Security & Investigations is also linked to “endangering the life” of Ivan Frias, who fell to his death from the 15th floor of a New York City construction site in 2022. Reprinted courtesy of Johanna Knapschaefer, Engineering News-Record Ms. Knapschaefer may be contacted at knapj@enr.com Read the full story...

    Leftover Equipment and Materials When a Contractor Is Abruptly Terminated

    November 06, 2023 —
    Termination for cause is costly and adversarial and has been covered in this article. But can a terminating party use equipment and tools left behind on the worksite (i.e., a crane)? The answer depends on what is in your contract. Under ConsensusDocs, a constructor must give its permission to use any equipment or supplies left at the worksite, such as a crane.[i] Moreover, the owner must indemnify the constructor for using their equipment. This makes sense because even if a constructor were appropriately terminated for cause, using their equipment and materials they no longer possess or control unfairly creates additional liability exposure. At a minimum, the owner should take on the risk of using the equipment and materials since they benefit from such use. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brian Perlberg, ConsensusDocs Coalition
    Mr. Perlberg may be contacted at bperlberg@ConsensusDocs.org