BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Anaheim California condominium expert witness Anaheim California parking structure expert witness Anaheim California production housing expert witness Anaheim California hospital construction expert witness Anaheim California high-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California office building expert witness Anaheim California housing expert witness Anaheim California industrial building expert witness Anaheim California custom home expert witness Anaheim California condominiums expert witness Anaheim California retail construction expert witness Anaheim California concrete tilt-up expert witness Anaheim California low-income housing expert witness Anaheim California casino resort expert witness Anaheim California Medical building expert witness Anaheim California mid-rise construction expert witness Anaheim California landscaping construction expert witness Anaheim California Subterranean parking expert witness Anaheim California custom homes expert witness Anaheim California structural steel construction expert witness Anaheim California institutional building expert witness Anaheim California
    Anaheim California construction safety expertAnaheim California forensic architectAnaheim California defective construction expertAnaheim California architect expert witnessAnaheim California construction cost estimating expert witnessAnaheim California construction scheduling expert witnessAnaheim California soil failure expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211

    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501
    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614

    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355
    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535
    Anaheim California Construction Expert Witness 10/ 10


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California


    Insurer's Refusal to Consider Supplemental Claim Found Improper

    Louisiana Couple Sues over Defects in Foreclosed Home

    Sureties do not Issue Bonds Risk-Free to the Bond-Principal

    Fort Lauderdale Associate Secures Summary Judgment in Rare Premises Liability Win

    Less Than Perfectly Drafted Endorsement Bars Flood Coverage

    Potential Coverage Issues Implicated by the Champlain Towers Collapse

    Insurer Prohibited from Bringing Separate Contribution Action in Subrogation to Rights of Suspended Insured

    “He Chose…Poorly: How Bad DSC Clauses Lead to Project Doom in the Last Crusade of Construction Risk”

    Alexus Williams Receives Missouri Lawyers Media 2021 Women’s Justice Pro Bono Award

    Ben L. Aderholt Joins Coats Rose Construction Litigation Group

    Mitigation, Restructuring and Bankruptcy: Small Business Tools in the Era of COVID-19

    Minnesota Senate Office Building Called Unconstitutional

    LLMs in Construction: Where They Fail and Where They Shine

    California Court of Appeal Holds That the Right to Repair Act Prohibits Class Actions Against Manufacturers of Products Completely Manufactured Offsite

    Ohio Rejects the Majority Trend and Finds No Liability Coverage for a Subcontractor’s Faulty Work

    Insured's Expert Qualified, Judgment for Coverage Affirmed

    Insurers' Communications Through Brokers Not Privileged

    Arizona Rooftop Safety: Is it Adequate or Substandard?

    Revisiting OSHA’s Controlling Employer Policy

    First Quarter Gains in Housing Affordability

    Quick Note: Can a Party Disclaim Liability in their Contract to Fraud?

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (04/18/23) – Clean Energy, Critical Infrastructure and Commercial Concerns

    Netflix Plans $900M Facility At Former New Jersey Army Base

    That’s Common Knowledge! Failure to Designate an Expert Witness in a Professional Negligence Case is Not Fatal Where “Common Knowledge” Exception Applies

    Builder and County Tussle over Unfinished Homes

    Save A Legal Fee? Sometimes You Better Talk With Your Construction Attorney

    Construction Litigation—Battles on Many Fronts

    Pillsbury Insights – Navigating the Real Estate Market During COVID-19

    Architect, Engineer, and Design Professional Liens in California: A Different Animal than the Mechanics’ Lien

    The Miller Act: More Complex than You Think

    E-Commerce Logistics Test Limits of Tilt-Up Construction

    City Potentially Liable for Cost Overrun on Not-to-Exceed Public Works Contract

    Architectural Firm, Fired by School District, Launches Lawsuit

    Excess Policy Triggered Once Retention Paid, Even if Loss Not Covered By Excess

    Be Mindful Accepting Payment When Amounts Owed Are In Dispute

    Statute of Frauds Applies to Sale of Real Property

    Uniformity in Florida’s Construction Bond Laws Brings About Fairness for the Industry

    Key Economic & Geopolitical Themes To Monitor In 2024

    Best Practices: Commercial Lockouts in Arizona

    Contractor's Agreement to Perform Does Not Preclude Coverage Under Contractual Liability Exclusion

    New Mexico Holds One-Sided Dispute Resolution Provisions Are Unenforceable

    US Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Chicago Cubs Stadium Renovation

    Missouri Legislature Passes Bill to Drastically Change Missouri’s “Consent Judgment” Statute

    Contractor Side Deals Can Waive Rights

    COVID-19 Case Remanded for Failure to Meet Amount in Controversy

    Taking Service Network Planning to the Next Level

    Eighth Circuit Finds that “Ensuing Loss” Clause Does Not Restore Coverage for Faulty Subcontractor Work

    Appellate Court of Maryland Construes Notice Conditions of A312 Performance Bond in Favor of Surety

    California Rejects Judgments By Confession Pursuant to Civil Code Section 1132

    Affordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 Trillion
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anaheim, California Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Anaheim's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    California Enacts Change Order Fair Payment Act

    March 24, 2026 —
    For private works construction contracts entered on or after January 1, 2026, recent legislation establishes a claims and dispute resolution process for change orders. The law is codified at Civil Code § 8850. A synopsis of the pertinent provisions includes the following:
    1. Submitting a Claim. Contractors or subcontractors must submit a detailed, documented claim when requesting additional time or payment.
    2. Owner’s Response Time. The owner must meet and confer within thirty (30) days after receiving the claim. Within ten (10) days of meeting, the owner must provide a written statement identifying which portions of the claim are undisputed and which are disputed. An owner’s failure to respond is treated as disputing the entire claim.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael J. Baker, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Baker may be contacted at mjbaker@swlaw.com

    Risks of Using an AI Chatbot for Legal Advice: Lessons from United States v. Heppner

    April 08, 2026 —
    Imagine that you are an executive (who is not a lawyer) and are concerned about what your company plans to do is legal. You could call your lawyer who might bill you for the call. Or, you can ask your AI chatbot, such as Claude or ChatGPT, about the legal risk. The chatbot will likely compliment you on the incisive question, provide you with highly confident answer (that may or may not be right) and will not bill you on an hourly basis. That is essentially what financial services executive Bradley Heppner did. It did not end well. A federal court recently ruled that Heppner’s chats with the AI tool Claude were not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. That means that the other side (in this case, the federal government) could get access to his chatbot prompts, uploads and responses, and learn a great deal about, for example, whether Heppner knew what he was doing was illegal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears LLP

    Dallas County District Court Grants Kahana Feld’s Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution

    December 30, 2025 —
    Kahana Feld successfully obtained dismissal of a lawsuit in the 95th Judicial District Court of Dallas County. The Court granted our Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution, agreeing that the plaintiff failed to diligently pursue their claims after more than 18 months of inactivity, despite an upcoming trial date. Our team demonstrated that the plaintiff had not initiated discovery or scheduled depositions, and furthermore, the delay was not excused by former counsel’s withdrawal. Consequently, the judge declined the plaintiff’s request for additional time and dismissed the case without prejudice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    March 24, 2026 —
    Property owners, contractors, and others dealing with mechanics and materialmen’s liens in Georgia should keep an eye on HB 676, which is currently making its way through the Georgia General Assembly. The bill aims to curb misuse of the lien process and provide additional remedies to those challenging a frivolous lien filing. What HB 676 Would Do HB 676 would add a new Code section (O.C.G.A. § 44-14-366.6) to the mechanics and materialmen’s lien statutes. If a lien is filed “without substantial justification or that is not made in good faith or that is made with malice or a wrongful purpose,” this new Code section would impose a fine of $1,500 per lien on the lien claimant, in addition to any attorney’s fees or court costs incurred by the party challenging the lien. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Robert Lafayette, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Lafayette may be contacted at rlafayette@seyfarth.com

    Modular Construction’s Big Boom: New Risks Outpacing Standard Contracts in Industrial Projects

    March 24, 2026 —
    Modular construction is revolutionizing the construction industry, tackling labor shortages, sustainability goals and supply-chain challenges, with the global market for modular and prefabricated construction projected to reach over $200 billion by 2030. While residential builders have embraced modular’s speed and affordability, the greatest risks—and opportunities—are emerging in the industrial sector, where project scale and complexity demand new legal strategies. In 2023, Chad Theriot explored industrial and infrastructure applications of modular construction, addressing risks like offsite fabrication and integration complexities in his article, “The Rise of Modular Construction—Impacts for Consideration.” Since that time, modular construction has continued to experience significant advancements and has been increasingly adopted by contractors across a broad spectrum of industrial and commercial projects. As modular construction continues to reshape the industrial landscape, contractors and owners alike must be mindful of the legal implications associated with its use, specifically as it relates to liability and risk allocation, regulatory compliance, quality control and upstream factors such as transportation and intellectual property concerns. Reprinted courtesy of Chad Theriot and Jack Mayo, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Parking Garage Partially Collapses in Dearborn, Mich., Trapping One

    March 31, 2026 —
    A multi-level parking garage that partially collapsed in Dearborn, Mich., is fenced off and the city has started the legal process allowed under state law to demolish the privately-owned structure due to alleged dangerous conditions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Annemarie Mannion, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Mannion may be contacted at manniona@enr.com

    2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes 14 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    LOS ANGELES AND ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 14 attorneys in its Los Angeles and Orange County offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers publication. Of those 15, six were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage

    April 08, 2026 —
    The Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insured’s agent because there was no breach of duty. Jon Van Order v. Hauk, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2378 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2025). The insured began renovating a vacant home in October 2018. He met with agent Joseph Hauk and explained the property was vacant and would be going through renovations for the next several months. Hauk then procured a policy through Shelter Insurance Company insuring the vacant property against several specified perils. The policy provided coverage for water damage if “[t]he exterior of the building sustained a covered loss” and “that loss created an opening through which the water entered.” Damage caused by escaping water from within a plumbing system was excluded if: (1) the damage was caused by a “continuous or repeated leakage over a period of fourteen days or more” or (2) the insured premises had been vacant for 30 consecutive days immediately preceding the loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com