Washington’s Court of Appeals Protects Contracting Parties’ Rights to Define the Terms of their Indemnity Agreements
March 19, 2024 —
Margarita Kutsin - Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCIt has long been the law in Washington that contracting parties are free to draft contractual indemnity agreements to allocate risk arising from performance of the work, and Courts will generally enforce those agreements as written. This well-settled principle was recently reaffirmed in King County v. CPM Development Corp., dba ICON Materials[1] a decision from Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals, wherein one party to an indemnity agreement attempted to evade its contractual obligations by arguing that certain common law indemnity principles supersede the written terms. This appeal followed a multi-week jury trial from which the client and Ahlers Cressman and Sleight legal team, including Lindsay Watkins, Klien Hilliard, and Christina Granquist, obtained a seven-figure judgment in the client’s favor, including an award of all attorneys’ fees and costs.
ICON was the general contractor on a Vashon Island Highway Pavement project for King County. Part of the work on the project involved hauling away and disposing of ground milled asphalt (the “millings”) at King County-approved sites. ICON and D&R Excavating Inc., (“D&R”) executed a subcontract for D&R to perform that work. The subcontract incorporated the contract between ICON and King County, including the obligation to stockpile millings only at approved sites. D&R, however, did not obtain the requisite approvals from King County, and placed the millings at various sites on the Island, including locations that King County explicitly rejected.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Margarita Kutsin, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCMs. Kutsin may be contacted at
margarita.kutsin@acslawyers.com
CGL Policy May Not Cover Cybersecurity and Data-Related Losses
March 25, 2024 —
Susana Arce - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.The construction industry, like many other industries, has experienced an increased reliance on, and implementation of, technology in the past few years. Smart phones and tablets are used on most project sites, computers are an integral part of the planning process, and various software programs are used throughout the construction process. Likewise, much of the machinery and equipment used during construction (e.g., total stations, trucks, tower cranes) is interconnected, and in some cases, operated or monitored remotely.1
With an increase in technology comes a risk of cybersecurity and data-related losses. Many large businesses purchase Commercial General Liability (“CGL”) insurance and assume cybersecurity and data-related losses are covered. Unfortunately, this is generally not the case. CGL policies typically cover three general types of damage: bodily injury, property damage, and advertising injury.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Susana Arce, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.Ms. Arce may be contacted at
SArce@sdvlaw.com
Construction Litigation Roundup: “Ursinus is Cleared!”
March 11, 2024 —
Daniel Lund III - LexologyUrsinus University in Pennsylvania – a “private, nonprofit liberal arts college” – funded a construction project for a new building utilizing monies loaned by the Montgomery County Health and Higher Education Authority, a public economic development authority “formed by the Board of County Commissioners… authorized to issue bonds relative to projects for eligible educational institution such as Ursinus.”
Loans up to the amount of $23,000,000 became available to the University, and construction proceeded using the loans as construction funds. At issue: whether a project was to be considered publicly funded project such that prevailing wage rates were required to be paid. IBEW filed a related grievance with the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry’s Bureau of Labor Law Compliance, which was refused by the Bureau, on the basis that because work was “financed completely by loans from the Authority, which Ursinus was required to repay in their entirety, the Project was ultimately funded through private sources and exempt from coverage under the [Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Act].” A grievance to the Prevailing Wage Appeals Board ensued, and the Board took a different position.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Daniel Lund III, PhelpsMr. Lund may be contacted at
daniel.lund@phelps.com
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/18/23) – Zillow’s New Pilot Program, Production Begins at Solar Panel Plant in Georgia, and More Diversity on Contracts for Buffalo Bills Stadium
November 27, 2023 —
Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogIn our latest roundup, Netflix announces plans to open brick-and-mortar locations, NYU develops a way to examine buildings using drones, robots and AI, distressed U.S. commercial real estate hits a 10-year high, and more!
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team
Jason Feld Awarded Volunteer of the Year by Claims & Litigation Management Alliance
April 15, 2024 —
Linda Carter - Kahana FeldOn April 3, 2024, Kahana Feld’s Co-Founding Partner, Jason Feld was honored by the Claims & Litigation Management Alliance (CLM) with the Inaugural Volunteer of the Year award.
The CEO of CLM, Ronna Ruppelt stated, “The new CLM Volunteer of the Year award honors dedicated members who passionately serve the CLM community. Jason’s service spans over a decade as both the President and Director of Events for the Orange County Chapter. Under his guidance, this chapter has flourished – not only educating and connecting the CLM community but rallying members to give back to the local community through service events in the process. Jason is also a frequent writer, speaker, and contributor for CLM events, and we are proud to honor him as our inaugural CLM Volunteer of the Year.”
Mr. Feld is a renowned nationwide construction claims leader who actively speaks at industry events. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers and provides personal counsel for multiple national and regional builders, developers, and contractors. With his vast experience and expertise, Mr. Feld is a trusted authority in the field and is highly regarded for his legal representation.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Linda Carter, Kahana FeldMs. Carter may be contacted at
lcarter@kahanafeld.com
Claims Litigated Under Government Claims Act Must “Fairly Reflect” Factual Claims Made in Underlying Government Claim
November 27, 2023 —
Garret Murai - California Construction Law BlogUnlike horseshoes and hand grenades, close sometimes isn’t close enough.
In the next case, Hernandez v. City of Stockton, 90 Cal.App.5th 1222 (2023), the Third District Court of appeal found that a pedestrian who sued a public entity for personal injuries caused by an “uplifted sidewalk” was barred from pursuing his claim when it was revealed that he had in fact injured himself by falling into a hole left by an “empty tree well” (i.e., a tree well that did not contain a tree”). According to the Court, the pedestrian’s claim was barred because the factual basis for recovery asserted in his complaint was not “fairly reflected” in his government claim.
The Hernandez Case
In April 2018, pedestrian Manual Sanchez Hernandez injured himself while walking on a public sidewalk in Stockton, California. He submitted a government claim with the City of Stockton claiming that his injuries, which included injuries to his knee, hands and back, was caused by a dangerous condition on public property. In his government claim, Hernandez alleged that he tripped on an “uplifted sidewalk” at or near 230 E. Charter Way in Stockton, California and that his injuries were due because the City “negligently and recklessly designed, maintained and operated the subject property so as to cause [his] injuries.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Garret Murai, Nomos LLPMr. Murai may be contacted at
gmurai@nomosllp.com
Traub Lieberman Partner Kathryn Keller and Associate Steven Hollis Secure Final Summary Judgment in Favor of Homeowner’s Insurance Company
April 02, 2024 —
Kathryn Keller & Steven A. Hollis - Traub LiebermanTraub Lieberman Partner Kathryn Keller and Associate Steven Hollis obtained summary judgment on behalf of a major homeowners’ insurer in a breach of contract action in the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Osceola County, Florida. The underlying claim involved a water loss in a bathroom of the Plaintiff’s property allegedly resulting in substantial damage to the home. The claim had been reported by Plaintiff’s counsel. The Plaintiff had retained counsel and two vendors before giving notice to the insurer. In addition, the insurer’s field adjuster was not provided the opportunity to inspect the plumbing parts that had been allegedly damaged. Specifically, the drainage system had been completely removed and replaced. The insurer retained an engineer, who concluded that the removal of the original plumbing components hindered the ability of the engineer to determine their conditions prior to removal. Meanwhile, the surface conditions of the white PVC pipe appeared bright and shiny as compared to other piping. The insured had also failed to provide a signed, sworn proof of loss within sixty days after the loss.
Reprinted courtesy of
Kathryn Keller, Traub Lieberman and
Steven A. Hollis, Traub Lieberman
Ms. Keller may be contacted at kkeller@tlsslaw.com
Mr. Hollis may be contacted at shollis@tlsslaw.com
Read the full story...
Meet BWBO’s 2024 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars!
April 29, 2024 —
Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLPBWB&O is proud to announce San Diego Partner
Johnpaul Salem, and Associates
C
Labor Under the Miller Act And Estoppel of Statute of LimitationsForget Palm Springs—Santa Fe Is the New Mecca for Modern ArchitectureJury Trials and Mediation in Philadelphia County: Virtually in PersonRhode Island Examines a Property Owner’s Intended Beneficiary Status and the Economic Loss Doctrine in the Context of a Construction ContractThe Goldilocks Rule: Panel Rejects Proposed Insurer-Specific MDL Proceedings for Four Large Insurers, but Establishes MDL Proceeding for the Smallest“If It Walks Like A Duck . . .” – Expert Testimony Not Always Required In Realtor Malpractice Cases Where Alleged Breach Of Duty Can Be Easily Understood By Lay PersonsThe Need for Situational Awareness in ConstructionFlorida's New Pre-Suit Notification Requirement: Retroactive or Prospective Application?Const
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules that Insurance Salesman had No Fiduciary Duty to Policyholders
Wilke Fleury Attorney Featured in 2022 Best Lawyers in America and Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch!
What Happens When a Secured Creditor Files a Late Claim in an Equity Receivership?
Lending Plunges to 17-Year Low as Rates Curtail Borrowing
Construction Law Alert: Unlicensed Contractors On Federal Projects Entitled To Payment Under The Miller Act
Architect Responds to Defect Lawsuit over Defects at Texas Courthouse
Massachusetts Court Holds Statute of Repose Bars Certain Asbestos-Related Construction Claims
Florida Federal Court Reinforces Principle That Precise Policy Language Is Required Before An Insurer Can Deny Coverage Based On An Exclusion
Construction Litigation Roundup: “Apparently, It’s Not Always Who You Know”
A Contractual Liability Exclusion Doesn't Preclude Insurer's Duty to Indemnify
Court Dismisses Coverage Action In Lieu of Pending State Case
Montana Significantly Revises Its Product Liability Laws
Florida Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Homeowners Unaware of Construction Defects and Lack of Permits
Judge Tells DOL to Cork its Pistol as New Overtime Rule is Blocked
BHA at The Basic Course in Texas Construction Law
Business Interruption Insurance Coverage Act of 2020: Yet Another Reason to Promptly Notify Insurers of COVID-19 Losses
Order for Appraisal Affirmed After Insureds Comply with Post-Loss Obligations
California Supreme Court Protects California Policyholders for Intentional Acts of Employees
University of Tennessee Commits to $1.9B Capital Plan
Automated Weather Insurance Could Offer Help in an Increasingly Hot World
URGENT: 'Catching Some Hell': Hurricane Michael Slams Into Florida
The California Privacy Rights Act Passed – Now What?
ISO Proposes New Designated Premises Endorsement in Response to Hawaii Decision
Asserting Non-Disclosure Claim Involving Residential Real Property and Whether Facts Are “Readily Observable”
Texas Supreme Court: Breach of Contract Not Required to Prevail on Statutory Bad Faith Claim
Insured's Claim for Replacement Cost Denied
How New York City Plans to Soak Up the Rain
Connecting IoT Data to BIM
Will There Be Construction Defect Legislation Introduced in the 2019 Colorado Legislative Session?
Almost Nothing Is Impossible
A Networked World of Buildings
Extreme Flooding Overwhelms New York Roadways, Killing 1 Person
Motion to Dismiss Denied Regarding Insureds' Claim For Collapse
Insurer’s Duty to Defend: When is it Triggered? When is it Not?
How Small Mistakes Can Have Serious Consequences Under California's Contractor Licensing Laws.
New York’s Highest Court Reverses Lower Court Ruling That Imposed Erroneous Timeliness Requirement For Disclaimers of Coverage
No Duty to Defend Construction Defect Claims
California’s Right To Repair Act Is The Sole Remedy For Damages For Construction Defects In New Residential Construction
Jobsite Safety Should Be Every Contractors' Priority
Toll Brothers Surges on May Gain in Deposits for New Homes
Engineering, Architecture, and Modern Technology – An Interview with Dr. Jakob Strømann-Andersen
Professional Services Exclusion Bars Coverage Where Ordinary Negligence is Inseparably Intertwined With Professional Service
Court Narrowly Interprets “Faulty Workmanship” Provision
Fifth Circuit Reverses Insurers’ Summary Judgment Award Based on "Your Work" Exclusion
California Supreme Court Finds Negligent Supervision Claim Alleges An Occurrence
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company
Engineer Pauses Fix of 'Sinking' Millennium Tower in San Francisco
William Lyon to Acquire RSI Communities
Florida Condo Collapse Shows Town’s Rich, Middle-Class Divide
The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute- The Claim
