Understanding the EPA’s Latest Proposed Drinking Water Contaminant Monitoring Rule, Published in Law360
September 01, 2026 —
Gordon Rees Scully MansukhaniThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Sixth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 6) represents another step in the federal government’s ongoing effort to identify and evaluate emerging contaminants in drinking water. The proposal would require certain public water systems to monitor and report on 30 unregulated drinking water contaminants from 2028 through 2030, while generating occurrence data that could inform future regulation and affect environmental, commercial, litigation and risk assessments.
In an article published by Law360, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Senior Counsel, Ayodeji Ayolola, analyzes the scope and practical implications of UCMR 6, including the contaminants selected, the proposed monitoring requirements for public water systems, and the EPA’s continued focus on PFAS and related organofluorine compounds. The article also touches upon the potential significance of publicly available monitoring data for businesses and property stakeholders.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
The AI Knows Too Much: When Employees Feed Trade Secrets into Generative AI Tools
April 14, 2026 —
Kazim A. Naqvi & John V. Mysliwiec - SheppardEvery time an employee pastes proprietary source code, a customer list, or a confidential business strategy into
ChatGPT,
Claude, or
Google Gemini, they may be quietly dismantling the legal protections that make those secrets worth protecting. Courts and regulators are only beginning to grapple with this problem, and right now, the burden of preventing it falls squarely on employers.
The Legal Stakes
Under the federal
Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”) and the
Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”) as adopted across most states, a trade secret plaintiff must show that the information at issue was subject to reasonable measures to maintain its secrecy. Courts have historically credited measures like confidentiality agreements, physical access controls, and employee training—but those safeguards were designed for a world of thumb drives and disgruntled employees. They were not built for a world where a well-meaning engineer can, in seconds, transmit an entire corpus of proprietary data to a third-party AI platform operating under terms of service that may permit the provider to use inputs for model training.
Reprinted courtesy of
Kazim A. Naqvi, Sheppard and
John V. Mysliwiec, Sheppard
Mr. Naqvi may be contacted at knaqvi@sheppard.com
Mr. Mysliwiec may be contacted at jmysliwiec@sheppard.com
Read the full story...
Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss
April 20, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026).
Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds.
Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day deadline for filing a proof of loss to one year, or until September 28, 2023. Bay Haven did not submit its proofs of loss until November 2023. FEMA granted an extension but only for the specific amounts in the November requests. Hartford did not waive the 60-day proof of loss requirement for any other proof of loss. Hartford paid the amounts reflected in the November submissions.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Mandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .
July 13, 2026 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsIn the past week or so mandatory arbitration has been all the rage. From those that argue that
arbitration is becoming more burdensome than litigation, to my friend and fellow construction attorney Scott Wolfe who gives great advice on how to make arbitration worth it again. You can place me in the camp of those that think that mandatory arbitration clauses of the type typically found in contracts can add a layer of expense that can be unnecessary.
However, if an arbitration clause is carefully drafted, and properly used, these clauses an be helpful in assuring that the streamlining effect for which arbitration was created actually occurs. Because the
contract is king in Virginia, these provisions can essentially create the rule of civil procedure used to resolve any dispute relating to the project.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight leads in recognized Construction Litigation Attorneys
September 01, 2026 —
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCAhlers Cressman & Sleight is pleased to announce its leading recognition in the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers magazine. With ten members named, ACS has more recognized Construction Litigation attorneys than any other firm on the 2026 Washington Super Lawyers list, compared to three at the next closest firm. Two ACS members were also recognized on the 2026 Washington Rising Stars list.
Super Lawyers selects these recognized lawyers by using a patented multiphase selection process. First, lawyers enter the candidate pool by being nominated by their peers or by being identified by managing partner surveys, third-party feedback, or the Super Lawyersresearch team. Next, Super Lawyersconducts an independently researched evaluation using twelve indicators of professional achievement and peer recognition: verdicts/settlements, transactions, representative clients, experience, honors/awards, special licenses/certifications, position within a law firm, bar and/or professional activity, pro bono and community service, scholarly lectures/writings, education/employment background, and other outstanding achievements. Then, candidates with the highest point totals serve on a Blue Ribbon panel, evaluating other candidates within their primary practice area. Finally, only 5% of attorneys are selected for the Super Lawyers list, and 2.5% of attorneys are selected for the Rising Stars list. More information about the Super Lawyers Selection Process can be found
here.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
Meet BWB&O’s Super Lawyers Rising Stars in Colorado!
April 08, 2026 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLPBremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is thrilled to share that Partner
Devin Brunson and Associate
Melissa Youngpeter have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 Colorado Rising Stars list. This recognition reflects their exceptional work in Personal Injury and Civil Litigation.
SUPER LAWYERS RISING STARS
Devin Brunson: 2024-2026
Melissa Youngpeter: 2026
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP
Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy
July 20, 2026 —
Anna M. Perry, Rachel S. Kindseth & Nina Catanzaro - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.I. Course of Construction Exclusions
Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy.
General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party.
Reprinted courtesy of
Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.,
Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and
Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth
Is Arbitration Final and Binding?Long-Planned Miami Mega Mixed-Use Development Nears Initial DebutMore Charges Anticipated in Las Vegas HOA ScamFederal Contract Termination For ConvenienceSavannah Homeowners Win Sizable Judgment in Mold Case against HVAC ContractorAnother Reason to Love Construction Mediation (Read: Why Mediation Works)Remote Work Issues to Consider in Light of COVID-19North Carolina Learns More Lessons From Latest StormCongratulations to Arezoo Jamshidi & Michael Parme Selected to the 2022 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars ListDeveloper Sues TVA After It Halts Nuke Site SaleAhlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC recognized by Construction Executive in The Top 50 Construction Law Firms™ of 2025The Future of Construction Work with Mark EhrlichCalifornia Supreme Court Approves of Annual Civility Oath for Attorneys, Rejects Incivility As Basis for Disciplinary MeasuresBreaking Down Homeowners Association Laws In CaliforniaFlorida’s Statute of Limitations / Repose for Actions Founded on Construction Improvement ModifiedClaim for Consequential Damages Survives Motion to DismissJudicial Panel Denies Nationwide Consolidation of COVID-19 Business Interruption CasesConstruction Litigation Roundup: “Give a Little Extra …”Cold Weather Causes Power Blackouts, Disruptions on JobsitesCybersecurity “Flash” Warning for Construction and Manufacturing BusinessesHouse of Digital TwinsA Performance-Based Energy Code in Seattle: Will It Save Existing Buildings?California Supreme Court Declines Request to Expand Exceptions to Privette Doctrine for Known HazardsUniform Rules Governing New York’s Supreme and County Courts Get An OverhaulReal Estate & Construction News Round-Up (06/29/22)Colorado Governor Polis’s Executive Order D 2020 101: Keeping Up with Colorado’s Shifting Eviction Landscape during COVID-194 Breakthrough Panama Canal Engineering InnovationsReconstructing the Francis Scott Key Bridge Utilizing the Progressive Design-Build MethodNavigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth2023 Executive Insights From Leaders in Construction LawComparative Breach of Contract – The New Benefit of the Bargain in Construction?Attorneys' Fees Awarded as Part of "Damages Because of Property Damage"A Closer Look at an HOA Board Member’s Duty to HomeownersMaking the Construction Industry a Safer place for WomenA New Perspective on Mapping Construction Sites with the Crane Camera SystemPinnacle Controls in VeranoIs Your Home Improvement Contract Putting You At Risk?Technology and the Environment Lead Construction Trends That Will Continue Through 2019CA Court of Appeal Reinstates Class Action Construction Defect Claims Against HomebuilderASHRAE Approves Groundbreaking Standard to Reduce the Risk of Disease Transmission in Indoor SpacesHow Technology Reduces the Risk of Façade DefectsToolbox Talk Series Recap - The Mediator's ProposalMediating Contract Claims and Disputes at the ASBCAConstruction Lien Needs to Be Recorded Within 90 Days from Lienor’s Final FurnishingTransportation Officials Make the Best of a Bumpy 2020Be a Good Neighbor: Techniques to Mitigate the Risk of Claims from Adjacent LandownersNTSB Outlines Pittsburgh Bridge Structure Specifics, Finding Collapse Cause Will Take MonthsChina Construction Bank Sued in US Over Reinsurance Fraud LossesCity Potentially Liable for Cost Overrun on Not-to-Exceed Public Works ContractColorado Supreme Court Finds Economic Loss Rule Applies to Allegations of Willful and Wanton ConductThe “Unavailability Exception” is Unavailable to Policyholders, According to New York Court of AppealsLand Use Team Wins Appeal for Affordable Senior Housing Development in San FranciscoAIA Releases Decennial 2017 Updates to its Contracts SuitesDisappointment on an Olympian Scale After Rio 2016 Summer GamesThis New Indicator Shows There's No Bubble Forming in U.S. Housing"My Bad, I Thought It Was in Good Faith" is Not Good Enough - Contractor Ordered to Pay Prompt Payment PenaltiesAAA Revises Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation ProceduresSupreme Court Eliminates Judicial 'Chevron' Deference to Federal Agency Statutory InterpretationsAdditional Insured Coverage ConfirmedWildfire Smoke Threatens to Wipe Out Decades of Air Pollution ProgressCOVID-19 Win for Policyholders! Court Approves "Direct Physical Loss" ArgumentNevada OSHA Provides Additional Requirements for Construction Employers to Address Feasibility of Social Distancing at Construction SitesThe Double-Breasted DilemmaFire Fears After Grenfell Disaster Set Back Wood Building in UKBuilding Supplier Sued for Late and Defective Building MaterialsCalifornia Bullet Train Clears Federal Environmental ApprovalA Landlord’s Guide to the Center for Disease Control’s Eviction MoratoriumOhio Supreme Court Rules That Wrongful Death Claims Are Subject to the Four-Year Statute of Repose for Medical Claims